Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 17, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64307 Email: [e-mail] STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717 Email: [e-mail] ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686 Email: [e-mail] WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: CV 08-05371 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF FORTINET, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT TREND MICRO INCORPORATED'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: CV 08-05371 MMC

TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a California corporation, Defendant.

3624711_1.DOC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Having considered Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc.'s Administrative Motion Requesting Leave to File Under Seal Portions of Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Trend Micro Incorporated's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet's administrative motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the following portions of Fortinet's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss are filed under seal: a) 1:14-15 (from "general..." through the end of the sentence); b) 2:1 (from "covenanted..." through "...infringement"); c) 2:2-3 (from ""covenant"..." through the end of the sentence); d) 3:23-4:7 (from "The License Agreement..." through the end of the paragraph); e) 4:22-23 (from"[or]..." through "...Fortinet,""); f) 7:17 (Section II title); g) 8:9-11 (from "Here,..." through the end of the paragraph); h) 8:13 (Section II.A.1 title); i) 8:14-10:14 (Entire Section II.A.1 including the first sentence of footnote 6 and footnote 7); j) 10:15 (Section II.A.2 title); k) 10:16-18 (from "Contrary..." through "..."or.""); l) 11:15-16 (from "Unlike..." through the end of the sentence); m) 12:11-12 (from "Indeed..." through the end of the sentence); n) 12:15-16 (the ten words between "prejudice pursuant" and "as is present here."); o) 12:19 (the seven words following "that Fortinet's claims"); p) 20:3 (Section IV title); q) 20:6-7 (from "Trend Micro's..." through "...royalties"); r) 20:9-13 (from "Specifically..." through "(emphasis added)."); s) 20:16-18 (from "which..." through the end of the sentence); t) 22:1-2 (the eight words between "involves" and "or supports"); and
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: CV 08-05371 MMC

-1-

3624711_1.DOC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:

u) 22:24-25 (the thirteen words between "In contrast to the" and "the covenant").

IT IS SO ORDERED

March 17, 2009 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge

Presented by: WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC.

FORTINET'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF FORTINET'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO.: CV 08-05371 MMC

-2-

3624711_1.DOC