Fortinet, Inc. v. Trend Micro Incorporated
Filing
77
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATED TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 20, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
ROBERT D. FRAM (State Bar No. 126750) E-Mail: rfram@cov.com COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 JO DALE CAROTHERS (State Bar No. 228703) E-Mail: jcarothers@cov.com COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 9191 Towne Centre Drive, 6th Floor San Diego, CA 92212-1226 Telephone: (858) 678-1800 Facsimile: (858) 678-1600 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant TREND MICRO INCORPORATED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Civil Case No.: CV 08-05371 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT TREND MICRO INCORPORATED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATED TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) DATE: June 26, 2009 TIME: 9:00 am COURTROOM: 7, 19th Floor JUDGE: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
15 Plaintiff & Counter-defendant, 16 v. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT TREND MICRO INCORPORATED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATED TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) Civil Case No.: CV 08-05371 MMC
TREND MICRO INCORPORATED, a California corporation, Defendant & Counterclaimant.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Upon consideration of Defendant and Counterclaimant Trend Micro Incorporated's Administrative Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Certain Documents Related to Renewed Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), and good cause appearing as described in the accompanying declaration of Christopher J. Longman, Defendant's Administrative Motion IS GRANTED. Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Andrew C. Byrnes in support of Renewed Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), which discloses information relating to confidential communications between the parties and to a confidential Settlement and Patent License Agreement ("Settlement Agreement") between Fortinet and Trend Micro shall be filed under seal. The following portions of Trend Micro's Renewed Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), which discloses confidential communications between the parties and the terms and conditions of a confidential Settlement and Patent License Agreement between the parties, shall also be filed under seal: (a) 1:11-13 (from "Trend Micro's..." through the end of the sentence); (b) 1:20-21 (from "On May 11..." through the end of the sentence); (c) 2:10-12 (from "Specifically, Trend Micro..." through the end of the sentence); (d) 2:24-3:4 (from "On May 11..." through the end of the block-quoted paragraph) (e) 3:15 (the word following the phrase "Fortinet has an"); (f) 4:5-6 (from "Trend Micro's May 11, 2009..." through the end of the sentence); (g) 4:27-5:1 (from "Trend Micro's May 11, 2009..." through the end of the sentence). Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to file under seal Exhibit 1 and the unredacted version of Trend Micro's Renewed Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 20 DATED: ____________, 2009 ___________________________ The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge Northern District of California 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT TREND MICRO INCORPORATED'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATED TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) Civil Case No.: CV 08-05371 MMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?