Palmer v. Salazar et al
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES: Granting 24 plaintiff's request. Plaintiff's opposition to dispositive motion is due 7/2/10. Defendants optional reply brief is due 7/30/10. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILL MOSES PALMER, III, Plaintiff, v. G. R. SALAZAR; et al., Defendants. /
No. C 08-5378 SI (pr) ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
Plaintiff filed an ex parte request for a sixty-day extension of time to file his opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss. Upon due consideration of the request and the accompanying declaration of plaintiff, the court GRANTS the request. (Docket # 24.) The court now sets the following new briefing schedule: 1. Plaintiff must file and serve on defense counsel his opposition to the dispositive
motion no later than July 2, 2010. 2. 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 26, 2010 _______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge Defendants must file and serve their reply brief (if any) no later than July 30,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?