Rodriguez v. State of California et al

Filing 36

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from August 28, 2009 to November 6, 2009. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than October 30, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 25, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STEVEN R. LEVY (California State Bar Number 103164) Attorney at Law 17670 Woodland Avenue Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Telephone: (408) 274-7000 Facsimile: (408) 274-9000 Email: slevy@bigfoot.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Donald Rodriguez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 August 25 D a te d : _____________________ , 2009 _______________________________ H O N . MAXINE M. CHESNEY U n ite d States District Judge A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than _O_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2009. _ ctober 30 T h e Case Management Conference is hereby CONTINUED from August 28, 2009 to 10:30 _N_ _ _m_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2009, at ______________ a.m./p.m. _ ove _ ber 6 Case Filed: Trial Date: December 1, 2008 N/A v. JAMES E. TILTON; MICHAEL C. GENEST; JOHN CHIANG; CLAUDE FINN; LOUIS DEBARRAICUA, M.D.; FILADELFO VALASQUEZ OANDASAN JR., M.D.; SAMBRAJYA LAKSHMI PALAGUMMI, M.D.; and DOES 1-100; DONALD RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, CASE NUMBER: C 08-05390 MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF, DONALD RODRIGUEZ) CMC Date: August 28, 2009 CMC Time: 10:30 a.m. Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney Department: Courtroom 7, 19th Floor C a s e Number: C 08-05390 M M C [ P r o p o s e d ] Order re Case M a n a g e m e n t Conference (Subm it t e d by Plaintiff, Donald Rodriguez) Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?