United Taxicab Workers et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 30

ORDER RE ORAL ARGUMENT ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 21, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED TAXICAB WORKERS, an unincorporated association, MARSHALL CHILDS, an individual, DAVID BARLOW, an individual, DAVID SCHNEIDER, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendants. / No. C 08-05415 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE ORAL ARGUMENT ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS The Court is inclined to rule on the motion for judgment on the pleadings on the papers and without oral argument. If, however, either counsel files a statement notifying the Court by FRIDAY, MAY 22, 2009 AT 2 P.M. that a young attorney (who has been four years or fewer out of law school) will argue the motion, then the Court will hear oral argument to provide the young attorney with an opportunity for argument and the ruling will be postponed. Please do not ask for oral argument for associates with more experience than four years. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 21, 2009 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?