Johnson v. Flores et al

Filing 3

ORDER OF DISMISSAL without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or submit a completed in forma pauperis application. Plaintiff may file a new action, but should include a filing fee or an in forma pauperis application with a new complaint to commence taht new action. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2009: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. EDWARD C. FLORES; et al., Defendants. / No. C 08-5425 SI (pr) ORDER OF DISMISSAL This pro se civil action was filed on December 2, 2008, at which time the court notified plaintiff in writing that the action was deficient due to the failure to pay the filing fee or furnish a completed and signed court-approved in forma pauperis application. Plaintiff was advised that failure to pay the fee or file the application materials within thirty days would result in dismissal of the action. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis application, and the deadline by which to do so has passed. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or submit a completed in forma pauperis application. Plaintiff may file a new action, but should include a filing fee or an in forma pauperis application with a new complaint to commence that new action. The clerk shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 13, 2009 _______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?