Leong v. Lykiardopolous et al
Filing
47
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why motion to enforce settlement agreement, Doc #41, should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 11/20/2009. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 1, 2009, plaintiff Mireille Leong moved to enforce the parties' settlement agreement, to compel performance and for attorney fees and costs. Doc #41. Defendants have not MIREILLE LEONG, Plaintiff, v GREGORY LYKIARDOPOLOUS and TRITON DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, INC, Defendants. / No C 08-5453 VRW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
submitted a response to plaintiff's motion, and the deadline for doing so has passed. Defendants are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before November 20, 2009 why plaintiff's motion should not be granted. Failure to respond to this order shall be deemed grounds
to grant the motion.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VACATED.
The hearing scheduled for November 5, 2009 is hereby The court will submit the matter on the papers unless a
hearing becomes necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
