Rosenbalm v. Mitchell
Filing
6
JUDGMENT: This action is dismissed without prejudice to plaintff asserting his claims in an action for which he pays the full filing fee at the time he files his complaint. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 In Re. 9 VINCENT ROSENBALM, 10 Plaintiff. / 11
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C 08-3508 SI (pr) No. C 08-3643 SI (pr) No. C 08-5239 SI (pr) No. C 08-5335 SI (pr) No. C 08-5459 SI (pr) JUDGMENT
United United States District Court
12 13 14
Each of these actions is dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff asserting his claims in
15 an action for which he pays the full filing fee at the time he files his complaint. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 4, 2009 ______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
