United States of America v. Bradley Mining Company

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing the Case Management Conference to 11/1/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/02/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice LOREN REMSBERG Trial Attorney Environmental Enforcement Section U.S. Department of Justice 601 D Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 Tel: (202) 514-3143 Fax: (202) 514-4180 E-mail: loren.remsberg@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRADLEY MINING COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:08-CV-05501 TEH JOINT STATUS REPORT, STIPULATION, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 4, 2010, Plaintiff United States and Defendant Bradley Mining Company ("Bradley Mining") filed separate status reports with the Court. Docket Nos. 24, 25. In its January 2010 status report, the United States described four open issues it was negotiating with Defendants in this and the related case, United States v. Bradley Mining Co. et al, No. 3:08-cv03968 (TEH): the extent of land transfers from the Bradley Trust to the Elem Tribe and United States, the terms of the release provided by the United States to the Defendants, the division of insurance proceeds between the United States and Bradley Mining, and the division of Bradley Mining's annual net income between the United States and Bradley Mining. Docket No. 24 at 4. On April 26, 2010, the parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order with the Court, stating that the parties had come to agreement but not yet finalized the general terms of a settlement. Docket No. 36 at 2. Pursuant to the stipulation, this Court entered an Order staying proceedings until the Initial Case Management Conference and requiring the parties to provide a joint report on case status, prospects of settlement, and case management scheduling by July 6, 2010. Docket No. 37 at 4. The parties hereby submit this report in response to the Court's Order. In the past two months, the parties have drafted and exchanged settlement documents to reflect the specific requirements of disbursement of insurance proceeds, division of annual income, land transfers, and covenants associated with the proposed settlement agreement. The parties have significantly narrowed their differences on these issues and continue to make substantial progress toward reaching a final agreement among the United States, the Defendants, and the Elem Tribe. The parties have also agreed to a scheduled meeting in mid-July at the Sulphur Bank Site to finalize proposed lot-line adjustments for one parcel. As provided in the proposed Order below, the parties jointly stipulate and request the Court to: (1) stay all proceedings in this matter, with the exception of any further mediationrelated proceedings, until the continued Initial Case Management Conference; and (2) continue the Initial Case Management Conference until November 1, 2010, so that the parties may conclude settlement negotiations regarding the terms of a proposed consent decree. The parties propose to report to the Court by October 4, 2010, regarding case status, prospects of settlement, and case management scheduling, if needed. 2 Joint Status Report, Stipulation, and [Proposed] Order - Case No. 3-08-CV-05501 TEH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (4) (3) (2) (1) IT IS SO STIPULATED. I attest that concurrence in the filing of this Joint Status Report, Stipulation, and [proposed] Order has been obtained from Mr. Jon K. Wactor, the attorney for Defendant Bradley Mining Company. Dated: July 2, 2010 /s/ Loren Remsberg Loren Remsberg Environmental Enforcement Section U.S. Department of Justice 601 D Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 Tel: (202) 514-3143 Fax: (202) 514-4180 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America Dated: July 2, 2010 /s/ Jon K. Wactor Jon K. Wactor Wactor & Wick LLP 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 950 Oakland, California 94612 Tel: (510) 465-5750 Fax: (510) 465-5697 Attorneys for Defendants Bradley Mining Company and Frederick Bradley, as Trustee of the Worthen Bradley Family Trust [PROPOSED] ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED that: all proceedings in this matter, with the exception of any further mediation-related proceedings, shall be stayed until the continued Initial Case Management Conference; the Initial Case Management Conference, which is currently set for 1:30 p.m. on August 2, 2010, shall be continued until 1:30 p.m. on November 1, 2010, or a date thereafter that is set by the Court; the United States' response to the counterclaims is not due until January 3, 2011, 60 days after the continued Initial Case Management Conference; Bradley Trust's motion for summary judgment, currently scheduled for hearing on August 30, 2010, shall be continued until 10 a.m. on November 29, 2010; and 3 Joint Status Report, Stipulation, and [Proposed] Order - Case No. 3-08-CV-05501 TEH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (5) the parties shall provide a joint report to the Court on case status, prospects of settlement, and case management scheduling, if needed, by October 4, 2010. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 07/02/10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNIT ED THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE S S DISTRICT TE _________________________________ C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R 4 Joint Status Report, Stipulation, and [Proposed] Order - Case No. 3-08-CV-05501 TEH A C LI FO .H helton E Judge T enderso n R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?