Kim v. Interdent, Inc.

Filing 90

ORDER Re: Plaintiff's Further Deposition (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SARAH KIM, Plaintiff, v. INTERDENT INC., et al., Defendants. /

No. C 08-5565 SI ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S FURTHER DEPOSITION

A dispute has arisen regarding the scheduling of plaintiff's further deposition.1 Defendants seek an order compelling plaintiff's further deposition on May 28, 2010, in order to meet the current pretrial deadline of June 4, 2010 to file defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff states that she is unavailable on May 28 because she is pursuing a master's degree and has papers due and final exams scheduled between May 26 and May 30. Plaintiff states that she is available for deposition on June 1, and proposes that defendants be permitted to use the rough transcript of the deposition for the purpose of filing the summary judgment motion, followed by supplementing the rough transcript with the certified transcript upon receipt. The Court finds that plaintiff's proposal is reasonable, with a slight modification in the briefing schedule to account for the timing of plaintiff's deposition. Plaintiff shall appear for her resumed deposition on June 1, 2010, and defendants may use the rough deposition transcript, followed by supplementing with the certified transcript. Dispositive motions shall be filed by June 8, 2010,

The parties' letter briefs are found at Docket Nos. 88 and 89.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

oppositions are due June 22, 2010, replies are due by noon on June 29, 2010, and the hearing shall remain on July 9, 2010 at 9:00 am.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May ____, 2010

SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

2