Bitton et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 44

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. It is ordered that all claims alleged herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel , that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 9/21/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)

Download PDF
Bitton et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al Doc. 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 21, 2010 The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the above-titled action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims alleged herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. JEFFREY BITTON, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. C 08-5585 MMC ORDER OF DISMISSAL United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. / MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?