Rosenbalm v. Foulk
Filing
6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL : Plaintiff failed to comply with the order to pay the filing fee. The clark shall close the case. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2009: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 In Re. 9 VINCENT ROSENBALM, 10 Plaintiff. / On May 13, 2009, the court denied pauper status for plaintiff and ordered him to pay the 11
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C 08-5600 SI (pr) No. C 08-5606 SI (pr) ORDER OF DISMISSAL
United United States District Court
12 13
14 full $350.00 filing fee for each of these actions by June 12, 2009 or each action would be 15 dismissed. That deadline has passed but plaintiff never paid the filing fee for any of the actions. 16 Accordingly, each referenced action is dismissed because plaintiff failed to comply with the 17 order to pay the filing fee. The clerk shall close the file for each of the referenced cases. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2009 _____________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?