Barber et al v. City of Santa Rosa et al

Filing 106

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to the Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/16/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2010)

Barber et al v. City of Santa Rosa et al

Doc. 106

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALERIE BARBER and ROBERT HAMILTON, individually and as Successors in Interest for JESSE HAMILTON, deceased, v. Plaintiffs,

No. C 08-5649 MMC ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, et al., Defendants. /

The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the above-titled action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims alleged herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. In light of the above, the case management conference, pretrial conference, and trial dates are hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2010

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com