Buesgens et al v. Hart et al
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 27, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL L. BUESGENS, Plaintiff, v. BEVERLY HART, et al., Defendants /
No. C-08-5710 MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
The Court is in receipt of plaintiff's "Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 201(d)," filed March 25, 2009, by which plaintiff requests the Court take judicial notice of three "facts" that allegedly pertain to an ongoing proceeding plaintiff instituted against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") before the United States Merit System Protection Board. The motion is hereby DENIED, because the instant case is closed. Further, even assuming there is some type of controversy between plaintiff and the EEOC regarding one or more of the three "facts", this Court lacks jurisdiction to review such controversy in the context of the instant closed case. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 27, 2009
MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?