Garcia v. Chertoff et al

Filing 11

ORDER re 10 (setting hearing and briefing schedule). Hearing set for 3/20/2009 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/5/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney J OANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Assistant United States Attorney Acting Chief, Civil Division EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-6915 FAX: (415) 436-6927 Attorneys for Respondents **E-Filed 2/13/09** 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Petitioner, by and through her attorney of record, and respondents, by and through their 22 attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule: 23 Respondents' Return to the Habeas Petition: 24 Petitioner's Reply: 25 H e a r i n g: 26 27 28 STIPULATION C-08-5729-JF March 6, 2009 - irs Available Hearing Date F----t-------------------------------March 20, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. February 20, 2009 v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; NANCY ALCANTAR, Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and MICHAEL MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents. ARACELY DE JESUS FAJARDO GARCIA, Petitioner , ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 08-5729-JF STATUS REPORT; AND -------------------[PROPOSED] O RD ER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Date: February 4, 2009 Respectfully submitted, J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Respondents Date: February 4, 2009 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION C-08-5729-JF Date: 2/5/09 /s/ J AMES TODD BENNETT, Esq. Attorney for Petitioner O RD ER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?