Brady et al v. Conseco, Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER Motion Hearing set for 5/15/2009 09:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/3/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2009)

Case 3:08-cv-05746-SI

Document 46

Filed 03/27/2009

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

David J. Millstein (CSB #87878) MILLSTEIN & ASSOCIATES 100 The Embarcadero Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail:[e-mail] Scott D. Gilbert (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) August J. Matteis Jr. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) Jonathan M. Cohen (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) Alyson A. Foster (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) Benjamin R. Davidson (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) GILBERT OSHINSKY LLP 1100 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail] Counsel for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CEDRIC BRADY, DR. CHARLES HOVDEN, MARION HOVDEN, DR. EUGENE KREPS, DR. JOHN McNAMARA, DR. HISAJI SAKAI, and JEAN SAKAI, Individually and On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. CONSECO, INC. and CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No.: 3:08-CV-05746-SI

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

1

3:08-CV-05746-SI

Case 3:08-cv-05746-SI

Document 46

Filed 03/27/2009

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4

WHEREAS on December 24, 2008, plaintiffs Cedric Brady, Charles Hovden, Marion Hovden, Eugene Kreps, John McNamara, Hisahi Sakai and Jean Sakai ("Plainitffs") filed a Class Action Complaint against Conseco, Inc. and Conseco Life Insurance Company ("Defendants").

5 6 7 8 9 10

WHEREAS on March 6, 2009, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint. The Plaintiffs' response is currently due April 10, 2009, and a hearing is scheduled for May 1, 2009. WHEREAS Plaintiffs have requested and Defendants have agreed to extend by two weeks the date on which the Plaintiffs' response will be due and the date on which a hearing will

11 12 13 14 15

be scheduled. IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, that, subject to this Court's approval, Defendants will move this Court to dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint on May 15, 2009, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, and accordingly,

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

the Plaintiffs response to the Motion to Dismiss will be due on or before April 24, 2009.

Dated: March 27, 2009

Millstein & Associates By: /s/ David J. Millstein David J. Millstein Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: March 27, 2009

Gilbert Oshinsky LLP By: /s/ August J. Matteis Jr. August J. Matteis Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: March 27, 2009

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP By: /s/ David S. Clancy David S. Clancy Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

2

3:08-CV-05746-SI

Case 3:08-cv-05746-SI

Document 46

Filed 03/27/2009

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Benjamin R. Davidson, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to the Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 27th day of March 2009, at Washington, DC. By: /s/ Benjamin R. Davidson Benjamin R. Davidson

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED,

Dated:

By: ______________________________ Hon. Susan Illston

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

3

3:08-CV-05746-SI