Brady et al v. Conseco, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND. re 52 Signed by Judge ILLSTON on 4/28/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-05746-SI Document 52 Filed 04/24/2009 Page 1 of 3 1 RAOUL D. KENNEDY (STATE BAR NO. 40892) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 2 Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, California 94111 3 Telephone: (415) 984-6400 Facsimile: (415) 984-2698 4 Email: Raoul. Kennedy@skadden.co m 5 JAMES R. CARROLL (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) DAVID S. CLANCY (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) 6 CALE P. KEABLE (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 7 One Beacon Street, 31st Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02108 8 Telephone: (617) 573-4800 Facsimile: (617) 573-4822 9 Email: James.Carroll@skadden.com Email: David.Clancy@skadden.com 10 Email: Cale.Keable@skadden.co m 11 Attorneys for Defendants CONSECO, INC. and CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:08-CV-05746-SI STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 CEDRIC BRADY, DR. CHARLES HOVDEN, MARION HOVDEN, DR. 17 EUGENE KREPS, DR. JOHN McNAMARA, DR. HISAJI SAKAI, and JEAN SAKAI, 18 Individually and On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, 19 Plaint iffs, 20 v. 21 CONSECO, INC. and CONSECO LIFE 22 INSURANCE COMPANY, 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OT HERWISE RESPOND CASE NO. : 3:08-CV-05746-SI Case 3:08-cv-05746-SI Document 52 Filed 04/24/2009 Page 2 of 3 1 WHEREAS on December 24, 2008, plaint iffs Cedric Brady, Dr. Charles Hovden, 2 Marion Hovden, Dr. Eugene Kreps, Dr. John McNamara, Dr. Hisaji Sakai, and Jean Sakai (the 3 "Plaint iffs") filed a Complaint against defendants Conseco, Inc. and Conseco Life Insurance 4 Company (the "Defendants," referred to collect ively with the Plaint iffs as the "Parties"), in the San 5 Francisco Divisio n of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the 6 "Co mplaint"). On January 9, 2009, Plaint iffs served a summo ns and Complaint on each of the 7 Defendants; 8 WHEREAS on March 6, 2009, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the 9 Complaint (Docket No. 32); 10 WHEREAS pursuant to stipulat ion and the Court's Order, Plaint iffs' response to the 11 mot ion to dismiss was due on or before April 24, 2009 (Docket No. 49). On April 23, 2009, the 12 Plaint iffs filed wit h the Court an Amended Co mplaint (Docket No. 51); 13 WHEREAS the Defendants hereby wit hdraw their mot ion to dismiss in light of the 14 filing of the Amended Co mplaint; 15 WHEREAS Defendants have requested and Plaint iffs have agreed to extend the date 16 by which Defendants shall be required to answer, mo ve or otherwise respond to the Amended 17 Complaint to and including May 29, 2009; 18 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 19 undersigned, that, subject to this Court's approval, Defendants shall have to and including May 29, 20 2009, within which to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended Co mplaint. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATI ON EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OT HERWISE RESPOND CASE NO. : 3:08-CV-05746-SI 1 Case 3:08-cv-05746-SI Document 52 Filed 04/24/2009 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DATED: April 24, 2009 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 By: /s/ David S. Clancy Raoul D. Kennedy James R. Carroll (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) David S. Clancy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Cale P. Keable (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendants Conseco, Inc. and Conseco Life Insurance Co mpany ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flo m LLP DATED: April 24, 2009 Gilbert Oshinksy LLP By: /s/ August J. Matteis, Jr. August J. Matteis, Jr. Attorneys for Plaint iffs DATED: April 24, 2009 By: /s/ David J. Millstein David J. Millstein Attorneys for Plaint iffs Millstein & Associates I, David S. Clancy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulat ion And Proposed Order Extending Time To Answer, Move, Or Otherwise Respond 19 To The Amended Complaint. In compliance wit h General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each o f the other signatories. I 20 declare under penalt y of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 21 Executed this 24th day of April 2009, at New York, New York. 22 23 24 25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED, Dated: By: Hon. Susan Illston 27 26 28 STIPULATI ON EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OT HERWISE RESPOND CASE NO. : 3:08-CV-05746-SI By: /s/ David S. Clancy David S.Clancy 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?