Yelp! Inc. v. Instaplak, Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS INSTAPLAK, INC. AND MICHAEL STEPHEN STERN'S NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 19, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF/1577169v1 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP JAMES J.S. HOLMES (State Bar No. 126779) MATTHEW A. FISCHER (State Bar No. 191451) One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, 8th Fl. San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 Email: james.holmes@sdma.com Email: matthew.fischer@sdma.com Attorneys for Defendants, INSTAPLAK, INC., d/b/a IN THE SPOTLIGHT.COM, and MICHAEL STEPHEN STERN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA YELP! INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. INSTAPLAK, INC. D/B/A IN THE SPOTLIGHT.COM, and MICHAEL STEPHEN STERN, Defendants. CASE NO. CV 08-5761 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS INSTAPLAK, INC. AND MICHAEL STEPHEN STERN'S NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Pursuant to defendants Instaplak, Inc. d/b/a In The Spotlight.com and Michael Stephen Stern's Substitution of Counsel filed on March 13, 2009: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Instaplak, Inc. d/b/a In The Spotlight.com and Michael Stephen Stern's Substitution of Counsel is granted, and Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP are now attorneys of record for defendants Instaplak, Inc. d/b/a In The Spotlight.com and Michael Stephen Stern. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP ER C UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE N F D IS T IC T O R -1CASE NO. CV 08-5761 WHA ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL A LI FO DATED: March 19, 2009 illiam A Judge W lsup UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO Judge William Alsup R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED R NIA O ORD IT IS S ERED NO RT U O NO RT H RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?