Optimal Markets Inc v. FTI Consulting, Inc. et al

Filing 36

ORDER Granting 35 Stipulation Extending Time to Respoond to Conterclaims. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 3/23/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) MJacobs@mofo.com SHANE BRUN (CA SBN 179079) SBrun@mofo.com ALEXEI KLESTOFF (CA SBN 224016) AKlestoff@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Plaintiff OPTIMAL MARKETS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OPTIMAL MARKETS, INC., Plaintiff, v. FTI CONSULTING, INC., AUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, AUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., XONOMIC INC., DAVID SALANT, HAROLD LEA, PAUL MILGROM, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. DAVID SALANT, HAROLD LEA, PAUL MILGROM, AUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, AUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Counterclaimants, v. OPTIMAL MARKETS, INC., Counterdefendant. Case No. 08-05765-SC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. 08-05765-SC sf-2659975 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation filed on January 26, 2009, the parties agreed that Defendants would have until February 13, 2009 to file their answer to Optimal Markets' First A mended C omplaint; WHEREAS, Defendants answered the First Amended Complaint on February 13, 2009, and on that same date, Defendants Auction Technologies, LLC, Auction Technologies, Inc., David Salant, Harold Lea, and Paul Milgrom asserted Counterclaims against Optimal Markets. WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation filed on March 9, 2009, the parties agreed that Optimal Markets would have an extension until March 23, 2009 (from the original deadline of March 9, 2009) to answer Defendants David Salant, Harold Lea, Paul Milgrom, Auction Technologies, LLC, and Auction Technologies, Inc.'s Counterclaims, on account of Optimal Market's recent engagement of new counsel; WHEREAS, Optimal Markets' new counsel needs further time for investigation to properly respond to the Counterclaims and to prepare its answer; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT: 1. Optimal Markets shall have until April 6, 2009 to file a response to Defendants' Counterclaims. // // // // // 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. 08-05765-SC sf-2659975 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 20, 2009 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Robert Steinberg Daniel Scott Schecter By: _ /s/Daniel Scott Schecter Daniel Scott Schecter Attorneys for Defendants FTI CONSULTING, INC., AUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, AUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., XONOMIC INC., DAVID SALANT, HAROLD LEA, PAUL MILGROM Dated: March 20, 2009 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs Shane Brun Alexei Klestoff By: /s/ Shane Brun Shan Brun Attorneys for Plaintiff OPTIMAL MARKETS, INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March _____, 2009 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R E-Filing Attestation: I, Alexei Klestoff, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Counterclaims. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Shane Brun and Daniel Scott Schecter have concurred in this filing. 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS CASE NO. 08-05765-SC sf-2659975 A C LI FO Judge S amuel C onti R NIA ED O EDER SOBLR SAMUEL CONTI HONORA IT IS United States District Court Judge RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?