Zewdu v. Citigroup Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 43

ORDER RE HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF'S RULE 52 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT. Plaintiff's motion shall be filed no later than February 26, 2010. Defendant's opposition/cross-motion shall be filed no later than March 12, 2010. Plaintiff's rep ly/opposition shall be filed no later than March 26, 2010. Defendant's reply shall be filed no later than April 9, 2010. The hearing is continued from March 12, 2010 to April 30, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 21, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2009)

1 Michelle L. Roberts - CA STATE BAR NO. 239092 2 SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP 3 Oakland, CA 94607 5
410 - 12th Street, Suite 325 Telephone: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] Cassie Springer-Sullivan - CA STATE BAR NO. 221506

4 Facsimile: [phone] 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff

7 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 8 RYAN L. HARRISON Bar No. 230584 9 [e-mail] 10 Steuart Tower, 8th Floor 11 Telephone: [phone] 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 28
ST IP U LA T IO N AND [PR O P O SE D ] ORDE R RE HE A RIN G DA T E Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) ) CITIGROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY) PLAN, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ____________________________________ ) Case No. C 08-05770 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF'S RULE 52 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT San Francisco, CA 94105 One Market Plaza [e-mail] REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802

16 HANNA ZEWDU,

Plaintiff Hanna Zewdu and Defendant Citigroup Long Term Disability Plan (collectively referred

25 to as the "Parties") through their respective counsel stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on April 10, 2009, the Court set the hearing date for the Parties's Rule 52 Motion

27 and Cross-Motion for Judgment for March 12, 2009 (Docket Entry #18);

1

1 3 5 7 9

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2009, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Compel, which was assigned

2 to Judge Maria-Elena James (Docket Entry #24);
WHEREAS, on November 9, 2009, Judge James denied Plaintiff's Motion to Compel without

4 prejudice in accordance with the Court's Standing Order Re Discovery (Docket Entry #32);
WHEREAS, on December 18, 2009, the Parties filed Joint Letters to Judge James regarding the

6 Parties's discovery dispute;
WHEREAS, the current case schedule requires Plaintiff to file her Rule 52 Motion for Judgment

8 on January 29, 2009;
WHEREAS, the Parties do not believe that the pending discovery dispute will be resolved prior

10 to January 29, 2009, and seek to extend certain case deadlines to permit sufficient time for the resolution 11 of the discovery issues; 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Dated: December 18, 2009 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
By: /s/ Rebecca Hull Attorneys for Defendant Dated: December 18, 2009 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP By: Respectfully submitted, SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP /s/ Michelle L. Roberts Attorney for Plaintiff WHEREAS, the Parties have sought one extension of time in this matter regarding the ADR

13 deadline;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES: The case deadlines are now as follows: Plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: 2/26/09 Defendant's Opposition/Cross-motion: 3/12/09 Plaintiff's Reply/Opposition: 3/26/09 Hearing: 4/9/2010

ST IP U LA T IO N AND [PR O P O SE D ] ORDE R RE HE A RIN G DA T E

2

1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ST IP U LA T IO N AND [PR O P O SE D ] ORDE R RE HE A RIN G DA T E The case deadlines are now as follows: Plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: 2/26/09 Defendant's Opposition/Cross-motion: 3/12/09 Plaintiff's Reply/Opposition: 3/26/09 Hearing: 4/9/2010 Hearing: 4/30/10 ____________________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney U.S. District Court Judge 3/26/10 2/26/10 3/12/10

Defendant's Reply: 4/9/10

December 21, 8 Dated: ____________ 2009

3