Zewdu v. Citigroup Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 62

ORDER APPROVING SECOND STIPULATOIN RE HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF'S RULE 52 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT. The case deadlines are now as follows: plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: May 21, 2010; defendant's opposition/cross-motion: June 4, 2010; plaintiff's reply/opposition: June 18, 2010; defendant's reply: July 2, 2010; hearing: July 23, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 16, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)

Download PDF
1 Michelle L. Roberts - CA STATE BAR NO. 239092 2 SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP 3 Oakland, CA 94607 5 410 - 12th Street, Suite 325 Telephone: (510) 992-6130 E-mail: css@ssrlawgroup.com mlr@ssrlawgroup.com Cassie Springer-Sullivan - CA STATE BAR NO. 221506 4 Facsimile: (510) 280-7564 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 8 RYAN L. HARRISON Bar No. 230584 9 ryan.harrison@sdma.com 10 Steuart Tower, 8th Floor 11 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 16 HANNA ZEWDU, Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) ) CITIGROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY) PLAN, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ____________________________________ ) Case No. C 08-05770 MMC SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING DATE OF PLAINTIFF'S RULE 52 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT San Francisco, CA 94105 One Market Plaza rebecca.hull@sdma.com REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 Plaintiff Hanna Zewdu and Defendant Citigroup Long Term Disability Plan (collectively referred 25 to as the "Parties") through their respective counsel stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on December 21, 2009, pursuant to the Parties's stipulation, the Court reset the 27 hearing date for the Parties's Rule 52 Motion and Cross-Motion for Judgment for April 30, 2010 (Docket 28 Entry #43); 2N D ST IP U LA T IO N AND [PR O P O SE D ] ORDE R RE HE A RIN G DA T E 1 1 3 5 7 9 WHEREAS, on November 4, 2009, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Compel, which was assigned 2 to Judge Maria-Elena James (Docket Entry #24); WHEREAS, on November 9, 2009, Judge James denied Plaintiff's Motion to Compel without 4 prejudice in accordance with the Court's Standing Order Re Discovery (Docket Entry #32); WHEREAS, on December 18, 2009, the Parties filed Joint Letters to Judge James regarding the 6 Parties's discovery dispute; WHEREAS, the discovery dispute is still pending and the Parties await Judge James's ruling on 8 the Joint Letters; WHEREAS, the Parties do not believe that the pending discovery dispute will be resolved prior 10 to February 26, 2010, when Plaintiff must file her Rule 52 Motion for Judgment, and seek to extend 11 certain case deadlines to permit sufficient time for the resolution of the discovery issues; 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: February 12, 2010 23 24 25 26 Dated: February 12, 2010 27 28 By: /s/ Rebecca Hull Attorneys for Defendant By: Respectfully submitted, SPRINGER-SULLIVAN & ROBERTS LLP /s/ Michelle L. Roberts Attorney for Plaintiff WHEREAS, the Parties have sought two extensions of time in this matter, including the ADR 13 deadline and the hearing date for the Parties's Rule 52 Motion and Cross-Motion for Judgment; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES: The case deadlines are now as follows: Plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: May 21, 2010 Defendant's Opposition/Cross-motion: June 4, 2010 Plaintiff's Reply/Opposition: June 18, 2010 Defendant's Reply: July 2, 2010 Hearing: July 16, 2010 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 2N D ST IP U LA T IO N AND [PR O P O SE D ] ORDE R RE HE A RIN G DA T E 2 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2N D ST IP U LA T IO N AND [PR O P O SE D ] ORDE R RE HE A RIN G DA T E February 16, 2 Dated: ____________010 ____________________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney U.S. District Court Judge The case deadlines are now as follows: Plaintiff's Rule 52 Motion for Judgment: May 21, 2010 Defendant's Opposition/Cross-motion: June 4, 2010 Plaintiff's Reply/Opposition: June 18, 2010 Defendant's Reply: July 2, 2010 Hearing: July 16, 2010 July 23, 2010 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?