Water v. U.S. Department of Defense - Office of the Military Claims

Filing 29

ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 28 Stipulation filed by U.S. Department of Defense - Office of Military Claims. Signed by Judge James Larson on 8/19/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:08-cv-05778-JL Document28 Filed08/10/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney J OANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Chief, Civil Division EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 637-3697 FAX: (510) 637-3724 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 D ef en d a n t . 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // // // // // // // STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND PROPOSED ORDER C-08-5778-JL 1 v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ­ OFFICE OF MILITARY CLAIMS, JANE STILLWATER, Plaintiff , ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 08-5778-JL STIPULATION TO DISMISS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, and the United States Department of Defense, by and through its attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to dismissal of the aboveentitled action with prejudice. Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees. Case3:08-cv-05778-JL Document28 Filed08/10/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: August 10, 2009 Respectfully submitted, J OSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Dated: August 10, 2009 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 Dated: August ___, 2009 /s/ J ANE STILLWATER Pro Se O RD ER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________________ J AMES LARSON United States Magistrate Judge STIPULATION TO DISMISS AND PROPOSED ORDER C-08-5778-JL 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?