Haseltine v. Astrue

Filing 50

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 46 Ex Parte Application (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant. JO ANNE E. HASELTINE, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C 08-5782 BZ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION

Following a telephone conference where all parties were represented by counsel, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's ex parte motion dated December 10, 2009 is DENIED for not complying with Local Rule 7-10. If plaintiff believes

defendant has violated the Court's discovery order, she may file an appropriate motion in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Civil Local Rules by JANUARY 6, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff file her motion All motions shall

for summary judgment by JANUARY 13, 2010.

be filed on the Court's normal briefing schedule. Dated: December 16, 2009 Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge
G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\HASELTINE v. ASTRUE\ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION.wpd

1