Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Filing 202

ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White denying 37 Motion to Stay; denying 55 Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief; denying 83 Ex Parte Application ; adopting Report and Recommendations as to 93 Report and Recommendations.; denying 18 Motion to Enforce Judgment; denying 19 Motion to Amend/Correct ; ; denying 20 Motion to Enforce Judgment; denying 26 Motion to Enforce Judgment (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBORAH D. PETERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS, MOTION TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE, AND MOTION FOR STAY No. C 08-80030-MISC JSW United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 / This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Zimmerman's Report and Recommendation re: Plaintiffs' motions for assignment of rights, motion for stay, and motion to appear as amicus curiae. In his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Zimmerman recommends that this Court deny Plaintiffs' motions for assignment of rights, deny the motion for a stay, and deny the motion to appear as amicus curiae. There have been no objections filed thereto. The Court finds the Report correct, wellreasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motions for /// /// /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 assignment of rights are DENIED, the motion to stay is DENIED, and the motion to appear as amicus curiae is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 24, 2008 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?