Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Filing 232

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting #230 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID J. COOK, ESQ. (State Bar # 060859) ROBERT J. PERKISS, ESQ. (State Bar # 62386) COOK COLLECTION ATTORNEYS A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 165 Fell Street San Francisco, CA 94102 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 270 San Francisco, CA 94104-0270 Tel: (415) 989-4730 Fax: (415) 989-0491 File No. 52,759 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DEBORAH D. PETERSON, Personal Representatives of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION DEBORAH D. PETERSON, Personal ) Representative of the Estate of James C. ) Knipple (Dec.), et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) CASE NO. 3:08-mc-80030-JSW (BZ) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY Based upon the Application of Plaintiffs, and finding that the best interest of justice are served by translating the order and the underlying discovery to dispel any uncertainty as to the obligation to respond, for good cause appearing, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN's time to respond to the POST-JUDGMENT INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS shall be extended from January 30, 2009 to March 31, 2009. January 12, 2009 DATED: _____________________ _______________________________________ BERNARD ZIMMERMAN MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT C:\Documents and Settings\USDC\Local Settings\Temp\notes56FD74\PETERSONSFextord.wpd [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY - CASE NO. 3:08-mc-80030-JSW (BZ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?