Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited

Filing 16

NOTICE by Visto Corporation of the Manual Filing of Robson Declaration in Support of Opposition to Google's Motion to Quash Subpoena, or in the Alternative, for Protective Order; Cross-Motion to Compel (Kagay, Charles) (Filed on 3/31/2008)

Download PDF
Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS Steven J. Pollinger Texas State Bar No. 24011919 spollinger@mckoolsmith.com Geoffrey L. Smith Texas State Bar No. 24041939 gsmith@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8702 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 Martin C. Robson Texas State Bar No. 24004892 mrobson@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 Attorneys for Plaintiff Visto Corporation (Additional counsel listed on signature pages) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION VISTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, v. RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, and RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. Case No. CV-08-80031-JSW (JL) Court of Original Jurisdiction: Civil Action No. 2-06-CV-181-TJW(CE) United States District Court For The Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION REGARDING [UNREDACTED] DECLARATION OF MARTIN C. ROBSON IN SUPPORT OF VISTO'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; VISTO'S CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL; Date: 11 12 DALLAS, TEXAS MCKOOL SMITH 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Time: Judge: April 23, 2008 9:30 a.m. Magistrate Judge Larson Dallas 252934v1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION REGARDING: [UNREDACTED] DECLARATION OF MARTIN C. ROBSON IN SUPPORT OF VISTO'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; VISTO'S CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION The filing is in paper or physical form only, and is being maintained in the case file in the Clerk's Office. If you are a participant in this case, this filing has been served electronically. For information on retrieving this filing directly from the court, please see the Court's main web site at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov under Frequently Asked Questions ("FAQ"). This filing was not e-filed for the following reason(s): Voluminous Document (PDF file size larger than the e-filing system allows) Unable to Scan Documents Physical Object (description): Non-Graphic/Text Computer File (audio, video, etc.) on CD or other media Item under Seal Conformance with the Judicial Conference Policy (General order 53) X Other (description): Conditionally lodged with the Clerk pursuant to Civil 11 12 DALLAS, TEXAS MCKOOL SMITH 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Local Rule 79-5 until further order. Dated: March 31, 2008 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Charles M. Kagay Charles M. Kagay California State Bar No. 73377 SPIEGEL LIAO & KAGAY, LLP 388 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, California 94111 415.956.5959 (phone) 415.362.1431 (fax) cmk@slksf.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS Steven J. Pollinger Texas State Bar No. 24011919 spollinger@mckoolsmith.com Geoffrey L. Smith Texas State Bar No. 24041939 gsmith@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8702 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 Martin C. Robson Texas State Bar No. 24004892 mrobson@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF VISTO CORPORATION 11 12 DALLAS, TEXAS MCKOOL SMITH 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?