Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited

Filing 24

Proposed Order re 1 MOTION to Quash by Visto Corporation. (Kagay, Charles) (Filed on 3/31/2008)

Download PDF
Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION VISTO CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, v. RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, and RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. . Case No. CV-08-0031-MSC Court of Original Jurisdiction: Civil Action No. 2-06-CV-181-TJW(CE) United States District Court For The Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division [PROPOSED] ORDER RE GOOGLE'S MOTION TO QUASH, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; VISTO'S CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL 11 12 DALLAS, TEXAS MCKOOL SMITH 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that within five (5) business days from the date of this Order, Google, Inc. shall produce to Visto Corporation copies of all It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Google, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena, or in the Alternative, For Protective Order is denied. Before the Court is Google, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena, or in the Alternative, For Protective Order, and Visto Corporation's Cross-Motion to Compel Google to Comply with Third-Party Subpoena. After considering the motions, along with the response and replies, and all evidence presented by the parties, the Court finds that Google, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena, or in the Alternative, For Protective Order should be and hereby is DENIED, and Visto Corporation's Cross-Motion to Compel Google, Inc. to Comply with Third-Party Subpoena should be and hereby is GRANTED. Dallas 252933v1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION · ATTORNEYS documents within its possession, custody, or control that are responsive to the subpoena served on Google, Inc. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that within five (5) business days from the date of this Order, Google, Inc. shall identify and produce a corporate representative for deposition on the topics listed in the subpoena served on Google, Inc. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Google, Inc. reimburse Visto Corporation for the attorneys' fees and costs associated with the preparation of this motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this _____ day of ______________, 2008 11 12 DALLAS, TEXAS MCKOOL SMITH 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dallas 252933v1 _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?