Calcar Inc. et al v. The California Cars Initiative, Inc. et al
Filing
14
Declaration of Adam Barea in Support of
13 MOTION for Protective Order
Precluding Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition of Third-Party Google Inc. MOTION for Protective Order
Precluding Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition of Third-Party Google Inc.,
12 Memorandum in Opposition,
to Plaintiff Calcar, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Testimony from Third-Party Google Inc. filed byGoogle Inc.,. (Related document(s)
13 ,
12 ) (Herrick, Rachel) (Filed on 5/2/2008)
Calcar Inc. et al v. The California Cars Initiative, Inc. et al
Doc. 14
1 2 3 4 5 b 7
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller @ quinnemanuel.com
865 South Figueroa Street , 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: {213) 443-3000 Facsimile : (213) 443-3100 Rachel M. Herrick (Bar No. 191060) rachelherrick@ quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, California 94065-213 Attorneys for Third-Party Google Inc.
8 9 10 lI 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20. 21^ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
5320/2483670 , 3 ^^ DECLARATION OF ADAM BAREA Case No. 3:08-mc - 80083 MHP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CALCAR, INC., a California corporation ; and AMERICAN CALCAR, INC., a Delaware corporation , Plaintiffs ,
vs. THE CALIFORNIA CARS INITIATIVE, INC., an unknown business entity; and FELIX KRAMER, an individual , Defendants.
CASE NO. 3:08-mc-80083 MHP DECLARATION OF ADAM BAREA IN SUPPORT OF THIRD PARTY GOGGLE INC.'S (1) OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF
CALCAR' S MOTION TO COMPEL, AND {2} CROSS-MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Date: May 23, 2008 Time: 2:00 pm Crtrm.: 15
Dockets.Justia.com
1
I, Adam Barea, declare as follows: 1. I am a member of the bar of the State of New York, and a " Registered In
z 3
House Counsel" attorney with the bar of the State of California. I am employed as in-house
4 counsel for third party Google Inc. {"Google"). I make this declaration of my personal and 5 ^' firsthand knowledge and, if called and sworn as a witness, I could and would testify competently 6 (thereto. 7 8
2. I submit this declaration to provide the court with information and exhibits
cited in (1) Google's Opposition to PIaintiff Calcar, Int.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to
9 Compel Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Testimony, and {2) Google's Notice of Motion and Motion for 10 I Protective Order.
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 3. Google is a technology company based in Mountain View, California.
Google.org is the philanthropic arm of Google Inc., and offers grants and other support to organizations acting in the public interest. 4. In 2007, Google. org issued a charitable grant to The California Cars
Initiative ("TCCI"), anon-profit organization that promotes hybrid technology. 5. On March 18, 2008, Calcar, Inc. {"Calcar"), the plaintiff in a trademark
infringement action it brought against TCCI {to which Google is not a party), served Google with
18 f two subpoenas for documents and deposition testimony, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
19 I Procedure 45 and 30{b){6). The deposition subpoena called for a deposition on April 7, 2008.
201 The document subpoena called for the production of certain documents on April 7, 2008. True
21 I ^ and correct copies of those two subpoenas are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively.
22 23 6. Google subsequently engaged in several meet-and-confer efforts with
Calcar in regarding both subpoenas. On April 4, 2008, Google legal assistant Suzanne Abbott
24 ^ informed Calcar that it would consider producing documents responsive to the subpoena for 25 ^ documents, but that it did not believe a deposition of Google was warranted or necessary. Later 26 27 28
51320/2483670 . 35E320 83670.2
that same day, Ms. Abbott faxed Google's written objections to the deposition subpoena to Plaintiff's counsel Warren Bleeker. A true and correct copy of Google's written objections are attached hereto as Exhibit C. -2DECT,ARATION OF ADAM BAREA Case No. 3:08-mc - 80083 MHP
1
7.
Also on Apri14, 2008, Google received a facsimile from Mr. Bleeker
2 f indicating that, based on Google's telephonic representation that it would not produce a witness 3 4 5 6 7 for the deposition, Mr. Bleeker would not travel to San Francisco, California, for the deposition. $. On Apri19, 2008, I spoke with Mr. Bleeker . I confirmed that Google would
produce documents responsive to the document subpoena. I also stated Google's belief that the documents themselves would be sufficient to provide Calcar with the information it sought, and would demonstrate that no deposition would be necessary, given Goagle's lack of involvement in
8 the subject matter of the underlying lawsuit. Accordingly, I asked that the issue of the deposition
9 be deferred until Caicar had the opportunity to review the documents. 9. Google produced documents responsive to the document subpoena on April
10
II f 11, 200&. Google supplemented its production with two additional responsive documents on April
12 28, 2008. The entire production is 47 pages, and consists of TCCI's grant proposal (dated
13 February 25, 2007}, the Grant Agreement (dated March 23, 2007}, the grant letter from
14 15 Google.org (dated Apri123, 2007}, a status report from TCCI {dated February 15, 2008), an affidavit of Felix Kramer regarding the grant (dated February 21, 2008), and a handful of assorted
16 emails. 1 71
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
8367D,2 ^^
10.
I am informed and it is my understanding that several of the documents
Google produced to Calcar had already been produced by defendant TCCI earlier in this action. I am further informed that the Plaintiff CaIcar has already deposed defendant Felix Kramer and obtained testimony from Kramer concerning the Google.org grant agreement and the relationship and interactions between Google and TCCI. 11. Despite Google's document production on April 11, Calcar continued to
press for a deposition under Rule 30{b}{6}. In subsequent meet-and-confer efforts, on April 17, 2008, Mr. Bleeker indicated that Google need not file a motion for protective order because Calcar intended to move to compel the deposition anyway. When I asked Mr. Bleeker what information he thought Google possessed that would be in any way relevant to Calcar's trademark infringement action, Mr. Bleeker was unable to identify anything specific. 12. TCCI does not buy advertising from Google or sell advertising to Google.
..3_ DECLARATION OF ADAM BAREA Case No . 3:08-mc - 80083 MHP
1 2 3 4 5 6 AdSense).
13.
TCCI does not participate in any of Google's advertising programs (such as
14.
Gaoglc is not involved in TCCI's business or xn.arketing practices. Google .
is not a customer of TCCI,
I declare under penalty of perjury under the.laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this l day of California. , 200$ at Mountain View,
8 9 10 11 12 13 ^14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
5l320l2483670 .331324t 8367D.2
. Adam Barea
_4_ DECLARATION OF ADAM BARER
Case No . 3:08-mc-80083 MIS
EXHIBIT A
S
Isi:oxnxa
cor^sorati. oa,
St1^^'OENA iN A CIVU, ^^^ v.
Cnuhlum5u : ^ SACV07-x 0723 AG (JW^7x1 Central pietrict of California
'P333E CAT,xFORNIA CARS SNITYATTVl3, INC. , an unknown bumineas entity; and r·>;lrlx KRAMER , an indi.vi(^ual, 7'U: GOOGLE, I1^C .
.
1500 AmP^itheatre Parkway ^^ Maurttairt V^.ew, California ·54443
Q YQU ARE CaMMANJ^IrD IG appear in the i:)rrltcd StnteC District court ar the place, dato, and time spet:iGCd below to testify in the above case.
Pt.AG6 0G TE9TIh10NY Gl3URTRpOM
DATE AND
® YOt7 ARE COMM,4NDED to appear at the plrrce, efate, and lima 3pociGcd br:low to ttslify at the fairing of a deposition m the above case.
P#ACS Oa= DEAa51SfDN
DATE AND TtA!!: ^rI^P,
Arrto3,r3 & Porter, San FY3nCisa, C}L
94 New 1!4ontgea^er3r St. 94105, t415) 3x6-3440
April 7, 240$ 9:30 a.m.
[] YCU Aitly CQMMAM7F,D so produce and permit inspection and copying of the tbllawing dacumentg or objects aC the place, date, end dme apt:cffied below (list daoeanrmtY or objects):
PlAGtc
DATE=AND t1A#E
[^ YQU ARE CQh+1MAM]FD to permit in^cction of the following prCmiscs at Iho dato and time spcci6ed below, aaFJ^t^ DA ua
'
Any arganfzadon not a party to this suit that is subpoenaed for Uti9 ta[iing of a deposition ShA[I de5[gnate one or more of4cErs, directors, or managing agents, or other person$ wltio caasant to te^G (y err its behalf, and may set forth, for each person designated, ttte matters on which the person vrll[ tesllfy . Federal FiUl66 bf gull Procedure, 90(bx{i).
tSSU1N Ci^flCEFC^31atyATIfREANDTTrII ={ ivUICATE^ATTORHE' YFORPVUNTIFFORt^FQfQAN9^ DAiE
t55UING 6FF'ICERS NAME ADgRF$5 ANO TELEpNONENUMBitA
G. trrarren Slacker, Chxistie, Harker & Hale, LLP, 354 W. Colorado Elvd., f504 Pa9adena , California 911Q5, 56261 '1959940
[Su 1tuLe ii, ft6rnt kola orCwil lYOeeJarr. S^dediYLiYpS{e A I^· yid te}, Ost ^n M^1 ^ tr rotioo !i Ga+^wB id d'uaim other shin ¢AtricF 4! tuurncs , ruK dFrtrin turbrr rare rrfribcr. -- - ----
Av^aa
AOitff [RCr ) Z146} Subpaerta ut a t:irif Cue
nArl;
SEIiYED $IcR^rl;1T ptJ(PRIN719AStl5l
P1:tOQP OF 51=RVlC^ PucE
hU,NNER OF
E
SERYkU BY tl'Rlr^rf t+UW ^
TIt1,!<
DECIARRYiON Oi= SERVER
I tiedare under penalty of perjury under Efts laws M the United $ ta#es otAmerica chat the faregotng iniorret8llpn cofttainad in the PrOOf pl $9rvlce la true and correCL
^a9CUiBd tln
pA7{_ SIGN^TURI : DF$EitVER '
ARURE98 t7F SERVER
-- -
Rule 45, Fedcra! Rates ofGi+n^ Prtxztlurc. Suhdivision6 (a), (d), and (c}, av amended Dn;)ccaabtx t, 200G: (t) PAO' CEC310N OF PERSONS SU@1ELTT0 5UI3POEHA5, (iii} roquirv s person who is not a patty ar ra otTicc of r posy io
(s) ^ i^ n oC a su^p07^Y s^hsi^tak^e tciatsllWS v avoid pori^g uodne twrden u aepattt: oa a person subloce tD that ^ubpvara. 'fha court on Il loafers utu duly and txkalf of which the subpoena was valued a lmpata upon tkt party . dr attarexy m h,ne6 aC this duty nn a p p roprieta sanction , +rfiich rosy rAetlede. but k tux lilrtitcd to, last earniagt sad reasonable ot[oRlelrS fu. {x} (A} A paavtt 00(lantndad T4 D rtduce aAd pavA [ r06paCA0n , ^APYtnT. p lesttng , dr WIIIleGa6 df drslgWed rkCtreniea ] Iy Stored in orraatfoA, redeye, papea ,r.ddwrnemrortange^ktltfrtas . ar itispeaTion of pranias nod Ads upper m personal iht place ofpraduetiDU ur easpeelioA unless e4nuvatrdad to rppear lbr depotitiDO . hearrteE or irfal. (lay Sulsjai tD paragrapb (d]a) of Ueis ruk, a peAtrmt cominsAdod ae produDe Sod permli inrplrvtlon , t:opyite ;. tlalytii, or sampling any, withia l4 days after sLrYiee of free subpoma a before the a{me spoeitlod fm edmptiEACa if rush [ima is t ors shy i 9 dayr alter teerrita . Srl+.e upon the patty of nh0tney dr^if,7tated is she IttibpaClti writeca DbjOCtlesq Iv producinfS + aY avail oft[te dealgnafed rreattxials or iASpaelietn or the pmnisca -- or to prndtwing eteetrenicetlly atorgd faforauffon in the fora Ar farenE roqueatgd- if ab}odtiaA E4 ands. the patty sarviag thcsubpoma chap tedr be mtitlod to Inspect, Inpy, tat.ar sample tha tnaterlsls a iaspeet ehc promises except pamemtm>a order uClhe cage by which the eubpdata wet lastred . ICobjaction has 6aan outdo. aka parry ScsYing aka subpoaul may. upon twtiae t0 lk6 peXWn Cdaonanded l6 produce . move u an)' ume [ter xrt order' to tompal the ptnduetion , iffap6eeloA, nil. or sanlPliltg. Such an order to compel shall pwlacl aAyplxsea eopYiAR , who irndt sporty Oranofl-ica Dfa >> S+tY foam siynf nears ctPeasc rest +lting front the fnspoption, cnpyfnQ, rating, arESmpgng avmmendlod. (3) fA} pn teIItcfy lesotlon, rhedatlrt by which a suhpvana wts flarwd shall quesA or modify mecubplxrm ^fl incar srhstluuia! txpenrc [0 loves mprt Ikare 100 miles ID at[cad trial . tha cant may, ro prdtat r pawA rubject m or afrarrd by the sdbpatnt , gterlrte tk mods the tubpolaa 6e, xf rho party m w[tuse behalf tha subpoena is ilstrad thaws a substrutlnl resod for t1e614Ftimerty yr malaial that taruwt be odtetullsa met without undue Iwrdtttip and DS4tnti that she ptsspa tD whom the WGpDOta i5 addttaaed will be rcasotxabty cotnpttrtsatad . the tours may otdc rpparrrtct or prodetcsion duty upw speetl;ed ebaditiant. fd) Dlr17ES At 1tE5PC1N[3IHG TO SUf3f?OEMA. (1) (A) A pttsoet responding tD a rubpaara to prodtxx docurnmy stead Pt4d1lCO ehrm at ^ hcY att. Scept In the uauaf wurae Di busitetss a shdi Dfganut and label 1hCm b eO.rC+pgnd with the e:ate:gOiieS In the demEnd,
(13) Ifs subpotaa elder not e^oeify the fIM7a ex Cdrttta fdrprvduriag ebctronirxlly ' ttDrod lnlbrlvutlon, a pa'SOrt tbsponding m a sahpdeta mart produce the inCwmatina in n farm ol· fonds in whisk the person ordinarily meiretEiets it or in a farm or fixa[s that sera teardlubly xrsabla. (C) A paten rexpoAding eA a svbpotxea peed not produce rho sarnc electrottieally sl[xc0 inlbrmatidn its mu[ts e11AA testa fD[rie. (D) A paten rtapondlny rn a SubpoeAn peed nut prAVide disArrny Af clatrotticalty seaad inkrtrtatiart from wute;es that Rea parson ittaetiliee as not rsarmnbiy areeSSiLk lrmaora of undue burdae dt t: OSt. On maeion to compel discotsry or ao quash , rho person from wlmm distoveety is seu(jlet muss Sleow that the infbemttidn sought Is not rmsnArbly ucessiEle btcavt >c of uwlue bdrdeA or OOrt, if rhos aitdwing Is made, the cadre mty aonalerless Drdl4 ducovcry floor rdclt sources If Iheragoesrlna putythowS goodaalra , Cnnttideringlhc limGritans of Rule 2fiCbKYX C>. 7ka GGner may Spe6ify randtfinns forthe diseArSly.
(2) (A) When htformation subject m a tabpdcaa a wlthhcld do t oltfm that it b privitDgod [ rc tubjaa to pI'Dlcetion Iss tries-plrepaeatlors maiexialt , rho cfEim shell ba trMde esp[arly nod sfiaU ba sspparicd by A dtlariplian of ehc uamrc of the dncumatts. Izvuaunilutilaas, yr 1hlrJge nut pradtleed that h sufficient td intbtt the dcrrtel,dlna party t6 POr1teN flu et>mn r^idex, tarty trussaen 6usiAess ! n prrson, exetpe rhos. subsea lu it mm^loyled a ItICproY16 [ nntnfslauss [[a^3xB}(iii1ofrhisrule, ruckspusdnnw,ylAardatn ane+td lritl be CDmntared W W aaY[l CTDm any f11Gh pt}aC withilS tlla llilC in which rht slat is held; (ie7 reyuircrditxlnsvre uCprivi [eged ur nthrr pxuteettsf rtuua aatd t1A a>polnr
(i} requltd dlECioSUredf a trader earn tlrOthereltafidortlial rasearch, dwclopntenr , prdpmencrei5l inforltta [ ian, or
(ill rsquiro etia:(oxvro dC aA SiAYl7rIAad ^Cp4t'S OpIA1DA err infomeation nut cdoribing spe>ciElc armts a eractvrrncrs in derptat rod resulltng term the +arpext's study trtrda ual at she rnqupt Df any party, or
1 2 DEFIN^TY03r15 1, 4 S 6 7 8 g 1,0
ATTACC^NiE1VT A
The term "TCCI" refers to The California Cars Initiative , Inc, its
preclecessprs , successors , assigns, and all persons acting or purporting to act on its behalf, including but not limited to its employees, officers , directors,
shareholders , independent contractors, consultants , affiliates , accountants, and attorneys. ^. i `l'lte term "GOGGLE" refers to Google, Inc. its predecessors,
successors , assigns , and all persons acting or purporting to act on its behalf, irE that, under Rule ^0(b)(6) and 45 of the Federal Rules a#' Civil I'rQCedure, CALCAR, INC. AND Al1r1ERICAN CAzaCAR, INC. will twice the deposition upon oral examination pf GOOGLE, INC., last known address is 160a Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain'V'iew, CA 94Q43, cor ^^mencing on 9:30 a.m. at Arnold 8c porter, LLF located at 90 New Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94105, (415} 356-3000, or at another tune and place
YS.
Attorneys f©r Plaintiff,
CALCAR, INC: and AMERICAN CALCAR, INC.
LTi^ITED STATES bYS3^ICT CG^[.^RT CENTRAL ©ISTRICT CF CALIFORNIA
CALCAR, INC., a California co orati an· and AMERICAN CALCAR, ETC., a Delaware C Plaintiffs,
Case No . SACV07^00^23 AG (JW1x) NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF GUOGLE, l+ $7^RV1CE
t7A7L PLAN
-
S^RVEO SEitVED Oil iF'ROZTtiAat^ }
tt1tatt :ubjesl m ar aftxlod ty t),e m,opoens, Qwtstt or ttrodiry }ntrdrn ar expatse an a ptxsort tatbjal m that subptxns . ' Rte nowt Wt the subpoeat ar. if ehs party w ta1wR beha^ lhC subpaotNt is rued tieaws a bdtalf of which the wbpoau van iuatd shall mlrrxse Chic duly !ltd subrtantial fle0d lbr the Hslimody ar »trutxial liter cannot ba ttlharwii[ tad wil}roul impose npon . ehu party ar tdtptuy is hrueh of 1137 ^Y ^ apprteplWe WtdaC hudsll sA[t a7A4ei that Ilte to whom the ^b^^ ^ add^psCd ataxsion , whrth tttay i»t:lade, hut^ it not limited to last eaMengi usd ^ ^ rWS a a blY sompert^ted . thoma Daisy a ppesranae M peridtulivn Y rcesombJc attomcy 'a fce. anly upoh apcxiflod Candllian]. (2) (A)A p'SISOit aaMmatiQGd tO^Ce lard pueltit ittspcclioa , Copying, Icaib bDored iaftmnatim , books. teatttrg , or satapua6 of designiied (d} t7UFlE5 IPt i[ti'SPL1NafNCrTp sUBPO[7'iA.
itapexa , dodumptuortmgf'hkthtngs , arittspcctionafpttmirratdadttarppear mpessttndtlhnplscaoipmduuionarinrpadonm,leucoaunotdodtoltppac
far deporit[oa.lscatiagarttial .
(8) Sut+jcet la paragraph {d)(2) elf thir rule a pawn eomavutdtd to prcdurxandpermitiasp tSdod.eapytng . leFtiag.'MiimplinEmaJ:wtehin 14
(!)( A)Ap^l'satttsspondinStna^ttbpaettrtaprodureaowatrnesahsilprbduae thtm ss they are kopt sit n1s usual semen df busEtga or shtl[ orgBTtlte and
label Ihtan to etttrapand xith tht cateavria in the detrtand.
{B} Ifssubpoena else etol >< pwify the furmtu fttrrrti far pradtwlnSslttt : irottiwlly Staled { nlitanrtlna , a person 3YipandiQg ter' a saLpoam mWl peodtet:e the
days aRertctrieeoft6a wbpocaaorbeLxe the iit^ apntitiad lot tompGance if such time Es fens that 1 ^ days t^!!ee tervtoe . smrt npan Cu patty err sttortlsy
dai3ttated in the subposasi artitldt vbjectlasl to plndteeln^ any tx au of tits designated lrtaterial{ of inspooti[m of the promesa - err In produCldg Grz4oaically rtornd iafarmathtn In the forpi or tlumc eGtiat}ted, tfabjettiaa
a malt:, the putt' actviag the subpoata sle4lf ltd be attitled to Enspcet , egpy trst , orss t upletht : amtcia[stxin^tthaprrmisesLtteeptptmuanttaaamda^
of the tot+tt Iry 9rhith thnsultpteeta was salved . Jfobjee:iat leas beaerrwdy the putt' sav i ng the subpoena may, Ypod BOI i Ce [e I h t pCtfOn tattuaan d e d t 0 product, move at trey time for sn order b rAtltpel the ptoduclimt, iltlpeciisn,
eapyi,tg tgliaj, prstJttpllnR , SttCh ate otdarty epnpei aitell prstxt
u^ whvisddapaltyrxan^eernfapt l rtyframsi ® tifieantexpxeuerpu in ng from ^ theiarpsclion . copying. tating,orsampiinscomrnandad{3} [A) On limey trutlidn , the eonH try which a subpoena was fsauod shall tlua ^tl rx madifythe wbpoeata if it
ptrsan
^ fails tv aputy lwlvnible liras i6r caatpliam:e;
(i{} roquirts a pawn xhu is net a party err an oilSt : cx of a patty to reeds, tfrveE to a pit4! tttora shat IDO mtl6 !mm the pTars whcrc [had LT t:rnplaysd tx rxguruty trtmsaeti 4euiaea4 is Pasoa. etteept tt + aY, ,zttbjeCt to trio prnridtauafefause (cJ(J}{BxliE) of this tuk, wel, a ptrlort mqy to ttrdcto stttdd trio) be tonunattded Ter Cavil Gam nay such pleat within rite alert in whisk tli a trial is hcl$
6tfttirrtation in a torch or fordo is which the ppsan ordi>ir *lly mafetahu K or io s form or Torras lhae arc rea+ta^n:lay unable. {G:) A person ncpondiuo b a iubpseds trnod rwl ptttducc the senile staClraaisglb alored iafoemitiast ut aaarE mao one tbtrrt. {p) A pPtsa mpsndlnt: la a wbpveaa need riot pra+ride diaeway ttf ^tronieally starod Infottnedon 6om rotnoex that the paean fdtmfifies as rtol ^ ae:eaasibTe ^ss^ of Wtdue hordes ar cad. Qn tnsliaq to watpsl ^d16Y Or to gaaslt, the pttrsatt llvm whom disomrcr^ Ia saagltl rnyst tlww ^ the information caught is dot leaioawly steesahble botaast of undue buttlert w owl. If that sltrtwiag LS taedea Itta Nan may ttwtulteleas Crdcr d'sstsvdyftaensuehsourtcsifthtsregttrslingpat tyshd, oysuodtmtae, cuttsidaidp{isr ittnitationsofRule2G ( h}(21(C}. T1tt: sotatngyspesll^tCGndiliortsfortttzdiseovay. (2) (A) Vultp! rnforntatron aubjoet to a aubpoeaa is wghbtsld ore a e[atm ekat h $ pfi'I1cgCd orsubjsae to protmtiott as Irial -peparstion nutaia1i, 11te seem rltalt As marls captessly rani atw6 bt supported br a dracriptiaa of rhC nature of the dacurrttats , caettdxtnitxetvres, Of thtttas ant Predm^d that h su(Gcim! Iv rnsbla tde dotaading parry to oWtttx tlx elaltn,
(B) Iflnfmmu + artypro^iaCtdinreapanrewacnbpocnatittttitsulZjocttvasiaim of pfirlfege a of prott:Ctlost x eriai · peaparatioQ nsatGtaL the ix'^ raakfrtit the tdaim may ttutlfy snY party lhst teceivod the itefgretyefon of the eLim tmd the buts for iL Aticr btiR>i ttotllied, a petty aunt ptoaeptly rte4rre, aapeer[c, err drstray the spoeitlW iafprnlatirsn and nay etryies h has cad teat' trot ux nr divlasC the iniorraatirnt untik the claim is ttssolved . A roaciving ptvtY ^Y PRmg y presatl p1 eke infvrdtation to ]hs eavtt ands neat fur s tlatamirativtt of eke claim, 1f the rseciviat petty direlmed lira ialitratatisa i+efars being ttoti[lod , it hurl[ take rt'Atanahte steps to rsirieve it. 'Cbs who produced the lalottrYlkrtl must preeaveilte inforaptltM WAiI lhaeEWm it rtagivpd, si OONTEMPT. Failtera of say pasott wlehoeu adegteatu i : atarsc [n obcy a wbponw srrvod upca that tt^ mar ba dtxmsd a tomrnipi of the rota[ fiom whkh the subpoars issued. Alt adoQtt:ie Caws fcr faifurc to obey ptit53 what a whpteerta purpoits to rotptirc a ewnpcly i0 uiMd err a! s place: tMt tuidtin rho kimiu ptoridtd by ttausa{ii?sfsuhparagraph ( e 3xAl·
(ii7 sroys»rea diselusime of ptivite = ed tr dba protownd tnadu and na eiccptivn a tvaiverapplie ^ : Or ,
(iv)suh}octa a pesos io tutdne lntrd+n. {8} if a wbpoara (i} raquUes disolast+ne ofn tradesetra or athsrwnfideatiaf rrstxinah, dt:velopmmt . ar antdtnertfal [ nfomtarlert, Ol {ii) roguing diitlulurr of an ttnrctaitted ntpn:i's opinion (K inforrttatiatY nai 'tleacri6ing spexiiic aveats er eteeuaeaea to diapttLe and rrs'tdtin$ from the erpcrt'a study tnttde not it the r[^1it33 Of ai+y patty, a
1 2 3 DEFINITI!x
IZ 13 14 1E5 16 17 1$ 19 20 21 22 Z3 24 Z5 26 Z7 28
CiYry^ /^a.4G. a Nw10.41
Joshua A. $nrt HOWREY I.LP S50 Santh Ho a Street, Suite 1100 'Los Angeles, ^lifomia 90071 Attoms s for Defendants TAE CAL.IF^RNIA C^^S INITIATI'V'E,
INC.·and FELIX
MER
INC. and FELIX KRAMEI^.
I declare that I am employed by a member of the bar of this Court, at whose direction this service was made.
Executed an March 24, 2008 at Pasad a, California.
oma alas
EXHIBIT C
Googls Fnc. 16JD Amphitheatre Farravby htounta .n Vrew, Calrtom^a 34D43
Go ca^t^^
April 4, 2008
Tel: 650.253.345 Fax:654.2A4,3429 irN^v. gocgle.tom
>`:a FacsJmile Only (62b)5'T7^800 G. Warren Bleaker Christie, Parker & Hate, 3 L.t? 350 W. Colorado Blvd. Pasadena , CA 91I09 Re: CalCar Irtr. and American CalCar, Irtc. v. "The Ca'flYornia Cars Irtitiatlve, Ina and Felix Krasner. (internal Rel: No: b3115^7169^ and previoas ie#er Crom t:'=oa^e dated df4tL008. Dear G. Warren Bleaker:
We have rectived your subpoena for deposition , dated 03-17'-2008, in the abovcreferencedmatter.
Pursuant to Ruk 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and ell analogous rules tutder any applicable state law, Gaggle Ltc, ("Google"^ which is not a party to the underlying action, responds and objecls to the Subpoena for deposition testimony and the deposition topics {the "Topics") far at least the following reasons. 1. Goggle objects to the subpoena to appear for a deposition on the grounds that it imposes an undue burden on Google , a Han-party, to appear as a witness. Googlc also objects to the subpoena to appear for a deposition on the grotutds that fhe information sought can be obtained llttougit Iess burdensarrre means, including from the parties to the case, 2. Google objects to tho subpoena to appear for a deposition on the ^ounda it is vague , overbroad, duplicative , cumulative, unduly burdensome, and oppressive . Gvoglt objects to the subpoena to appear for a deposition to the extent that the subpoena is abusively drawn and served fox the purgase of annoying and harassing Gaggle, a non-party, 3. Gaogle objects to the Topics tg the extent they seek testimony that has been, or could be, obtained from any of the patties to the underlying litigation or by toss burdensome means. 4. Googie objects to tht: Topics on the grounds that they impose an undue burden and demand that Google, a non-parry, appear as a witness at its own expense . To the extent that Gaogie appears as a witness pursuant to the subpoena, Gaogle shall only do so upon compensation for coats, including anorney fees, related to the deposition. 5. Goggle objects to the Topics to the extent they stack testimony that contains, or may contain, trade secrets, nr other cottlideniial business or commeroial information entitled to protecEion under applicable common law, statutes or rules . Google objects to the extant lhat any Stipulated Protective Qrder entered in the coat: does not provide sufficient protec[ion for the information sought from Csoogle. 6. Googlc objects to the Topica to the extent they seek testimony protected from disclosure by the attorney-elicnt privilege , tho work product doctrine, nr any other applicable
I V·
I
VyV v Vl M
iW V'VTV·.
...· ^w.V4 lMi.1. /
Gcogle [nc. tS4a ArnphitheaCre Farkway Mountain vrer;, t·aldoinia 94043
^o r^gl^
7e1: 650.:53.3425 Fax: 654.Z49.J424 www.goaQle,tom
ptivilc $c or immunity . To the extent that Google testittes in response to tho Topics, Googlc wilt not testify as #o a,oytlvng protected by such prYVilegcs ar irrununities , and any inadvertent disclosure shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any such privilege ar itttmuniry. T. Googlc objects to the Topics to the extent they seek information that is sot within Google ' s knowledge. 8. Gcogle objects to the Tapirs to the extent that they arc vague , overbroad or unduly burdcnsonte, 9. Googlc objects to the Topics to the exterzi that thry calf for testianony that is neither relevant to the subjecE mailer of this action nor reasonably calculated to kcal to the discovery of admisatbie evidence. 10. Gcogle objects to the Topics to the extent that it seek testimony ar impose obligations beyond what is perntissibte under tho Federal Rules of Citn7 Provcdure or any applicable local rules. 1 i. Googlc objects to the Topics to the extent they seek testimony concerning a Large range of tapirs in only a short Limo frame for provid'sng the testimony , To the extent lliat Googk appears as a witnrss pursuant to the subpoena , Goode shall do so at a mutually agrecabte tune and place, If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Zegal investigations Support Department at t.^c^az.COl^1.LtNC^cooO[.x.cot+^t. Thank you. Very truly yaws,
Suzanne - ^ Abbott ^-^5 200$.04.04 1 Z;53:^ 8 -07'00'
Su2annc Abbott Legal Investigations Support
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?