Viacom International Inc. et al v. YouTube, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2008)

Download PDF
Viacom International Inc. et al v. YouTube, Inc. et al Doc. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN DIEGO COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com) LEO P. NORTON (216282) (lnorton@cooley.com) 4401 Eastgate Mall San Diego, CA 92121 Telephone: (858) 550-6000 Facsimile: (858) 550-6420 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP PETER J. WILLSEY (pro hac vice application pending) (pwillsey@cooley.com) 777 6th Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Telephone: (202) 842-7800 Facsimile: (202) 842-7899 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION PULASKI & MIDDLEMAN, LLC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. 08-CV-03888 SI DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1) Defendant Google Inc., by and through its undersigned counsel of record, hereby certifies pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 that it does not have a parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 1. DEF. GOOGLE INC.'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE S T A T E M E N T CASE NO. 08-CV-03888 SI Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: September 30, 3008 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) PETER J. WILLSEY (pro hac vice appl. pending) LEO P. NORTON (216282) /s/Leo P. Norton Leo P. Norton Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. Email: lnorton@cooley.com 605066 /SD 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN DIEGO 2. DEF. GOOGLE INC.'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE S T A T E M E N T CASE NO. 08-CV-03888 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?