Moss v. Dragon Capital et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER granting a further extension of time for defendants to respond to plaintiff's complaint to 9/14/09 (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LLP
REET 94111

DAVID J. BROWN (SBN 56628) MBV LAW LLP

855 Front Street San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-989-5143

Attorneys for Defendants John Shrimpton; TML Acquisition Ltd.; Enterprise Investment Management Limited; Vietnam Enterprise Investments Limited; Dragon Capital Management Limited; Tiberon Minerals PTE Ltd.; Vietnam Growth Fund Limited; and Vietnam Dragon Fund Limited

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

LAW

ST CA

101 VALLEJO SAN FRANCISCO

TREVOR MOSS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN SHRIMPTON; , et al., Defendants.

CASE NO. CV-09-0109 SC

STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Date: Time: Place: Judge: N/A N/A Courtroom 1, 17th floor Hon. Samuel Conti

MBV

In accordance with Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties stipulate that defendants
22

John Shrimpton, TML Acquisition Ltd., Enterprise Investment Management Limited,
23

Vietnam Enterprise Investments Limited, Dragon Capital Management Limited, Tiberon
24

Minerals PTE Ltd., Vietnam Growth Fund Limited and Vietnam Dragon Fund Limited
25

shall have an additional 12-days ­ up to Monday, September 14, 2009 ­ respond to the
26

Amended Complaint in this action. Such response may be or include challenges to ser27

vice of process, personal jurisdiction or other Rule 12(b) motions. This stipulation is
28
STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND CV-09-0109 SC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LLP
REET 94111

not intended to deprive or be a waiver of the full Rule 12(b) challenges available to defendants. One prior stipulation of 30 days has occurred.

Dated: August 31, 2009
Respectfully submitted, MBV LAW LLP

By __________/S/____________ David J. Brown Attorneys for all Defendants CRAIGIE, MCCARTHY & CLOW By_________ /S/ _____________ James M. Hanavan Attorneys for Plaintiff

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

LAW

101 VALLEJO SAN FRANCISCO

ST CA

MBV

UNIT ED

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2-

STIPULATION FURTHER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND CV-09-0109 SC

A

C

LI

FO

Judge S

amuel C

onti

R NIA

OO IT IS S

RDERE

D

RT U O

NO

RT
H