McMurray et al v Verizon Communications Inc et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 Stipulation, filed by Joe McMurray. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 4/25/09. Plaintiffs' response to the pending motions to dismiss now due 5/7/2009; reply briefs due 5/21/2009; hearing continued from 5/14/2009 to 6/3/2009 at 10:30 am. (vrwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2009)

Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW

Document 599

Filed 04/15/2009

Page 1 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BRUCE I. AFRAN CARL J. MAYER STEVEN E. SCHWARZ Attorneys for the Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION ___________________________________ This Document Relates To: McMurray v. Verizon Comm., Inc., No. 09-cv-0131-VRW ___________________________________ MDL Docket No. 06-1791 (VRW) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON S AND TELECOMMUNICATION CARRIER

[CIVIL L.R. 7-11] Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker

T Verizon, et al., 09-cv-0131-VRW (MDL 06-cv-1791-VRW).

and McMurray, et al. v.

1

Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW

Document 599

Filed 04/15/2009

Page 2 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 April 15, 2009 2. 1. in 09-cv-0131-VRW. C

RECITAL

omplaint in 09-cv-0131-VRW and noticed the motion for oral argument on May 14, 2009. Dkt. No. 11 in 09-cv-0131-VRW. On March 16, 2009, the Carrier Defendants filed Motions to Dkt. No. 12, 16

STIPULATION The McMurray Plaintiffs, the Government Defendants, and the Carrier

Defendants in 09-cv-0131-VRW, through their undersigned counsel, hereby request: a. That the McMurray Plaintiffs briefs in response to the pending motions shall be filed on or before May 7, 2009; b. That the Government Defendants and the Carrier Defendants briefs in reply shall be filed on or before May 21, 2009; and c. That the Government Defendants D ismiss be heard on June 3, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. By entering into this Stipulation, neither Plaintiffs nor Defendants waive any

procedural or substantive defenses, rights or objections, including, but not limited to, the right to challenge personal jurisdiction over any particular Defendant. Respectfully submitted, BRUCE I. AFRAN, Esq. 10 Braeburn Drive Princeton, NJ 08540 Telephone: [phone]

Verizon, et al., 09-cv-0131-VRW (MDL 06-cv-1791-VRW).

and McMurray, et al. v.

2

Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW

Document 599

Filed 04/15/2009

Page 7 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 St IT IS SO ORDERED, Dated: 21, 2009. is also ORDERED that Plaintif It is hereby ORDERED

[PROPOSED] ORDER N o. 11-17) shall be heard on June 3, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. It s to such motions shall be due on or before May 7, s replies shall be due on or before May
S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

UNIT ED

S

x, 2009
NO
aughn R Judge V

C N F D IS T IC T O Hon. Vaughn R. Walker R United States District Chief Judge

ER

A

LI

FO

Walker

R NIA

O IT IS S

ORDER

ED

Telecommunication C Verizon, et al., 09-cv-0131-VRW (MDL 06-cv-1791-VRW).

RT

H

X

and McMurray, et al. v.

7