Stevens v. Ayers
Filing
83
ORDER RE PETITIONER'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW CERTAIN CLAIMS FROM PETITION [re 74 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Charles Stevens, 82 Order, Set Hearings]. Counsel for petitioner and respondent's briefs due 1/9/2015. Petitioner brief due 1/16/2015. Petitioner's traverse due 12/23/2014. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 12/5/2014. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CHARLES STEVENS,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
Petitioner,
No. C 09-00137 WHA
v.
DEATH PENALTY CASE
KELLY MITCHELL, Acting
Warden, San Quentin State Prison,
Respondent.
ORDER RE PETITIONER’S
REQUEST TO WITHDRAW
CERTAIN CLAIMS FROM PETITION
/
16
17
The Court held a hearing at San Quentin prison with petitioner and petitioner’s counsel
18
on December 3, 2014, to hear his “motion to dismiss the penalty appeal” (ECF Dkt. 74).
19
Respondent’s counsel appeared at the beginning and end of the hearing, but did not participate
20
in the substantive colloquy. The substantive part of the hearing will remain under seal.
21
The essence of the problem is whether or not petitioner may direct his counsel to
22
withdraw and waive certain claims from his petition for habeas corpus relief, assuming that the
23
waiver of such claims by petitioner is competent, informed, and voluntary. Put differently, do
24
federal habeas counsel have a duty to make all plausible claims for relief regardless of the
25
client’s wishes or does a petitioner have the authority to direct his counsel to abandon certain
26
claims? Counsel requested the opportunity to brief the issue.
27
28
Accordingly, counsel for petitioner and respondent shall brief the issue of a petitioner’s
authority to direct his counsel to withdraw certain claims from his petition even if over the
1
objection of his own counsel. Such briefs are due on or before JANUARY 9, 2015, and are limited
2
to not more than twenty pages each.
3
The Court further expects that it will appoint, via separate order, additional counsel for
4
petitioner for the sole purpose of representing petitioner in his desire to direct his federal habeas
5
counsel to dismiss or withdraw certain claims from the petition, said brief to be due by
6
JANUARY 16.
7
This order further FINDS that petitioner is competent to make a decision to waive and to
8
withdraw the claims at issue, that he is and has been fully informed of the consequences of doing
9
so, including the inability to resurrect these claims at a future date, and that his decision to
withdraw and waive those claims is voluntary. For the time being, however, the claims at issue
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
will not be dismissed, pending briefing and further decision.
12
Petitioner’s traverse is still due on DECEMBER 23, 2014. However, the traverse need not
13
address claims 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 22, 26 and 27. A supplemental traverse on these claims may
14
be filed later pending the outcome of petitioner’s “motion to dismiss the penalty appeal” (ECF
15
Dkt. 74).
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated: December 5, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?