Long Haul, Inc. et al v. Regents of the University of California et al

Filing 56

ORDER Requiring Supplemental Briefing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 14, 2009. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LONG HAUL INC. and EAST BAY PRISONER SUPPORT, Plaintiffs, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. /

No. C 09-00168 JSW

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

Upon further consideration of the motions to dismiss currently pending, the Court DIRECTS Plaintiffs to submit supplemental briefing to address the following questions: (1) Are Plaintiffs bringing a First Amendment retaliation claim, i.e., that Defendants engaged in their search and seizure in retaliation for Plaintiffs or their members exercising their rights under the First Amendment? (2) If not, on what authority do Plaintiffs rely to indicate that the law demonstrating that their First Amendment rights were violated was clearly established at the time? /// /// /// ///

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Plaintiffs shall file such supplemental briefing by no later than September 29, 2009. Defendants may respond to Plaintiffs supplemental briefing by no later than October 13, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2009

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2