Saavedra v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 162

Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case Settled. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 10/18/12. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

MICHAEL ANTHONY SAAVEDRA,

13

Plaintiff,

14

v

15

A. HEDGPETH, et al.,

Case No C 09-178 CRB
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER
EARLY SETTLEMENT
PROCEEDING

Defendants.

16
17
18

A settlement conference in this matter was held on October 17, 2012 in San

19
20

Francisco. The results of that proceeding are indicated below:

21

(1)

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the
proceeding, each possessing the requisite settlement authority:

:

Plaintiff, Michael Saavedra, Pro Se by phone and Plaintiff’s counsel, Alicia

Adornato and John Pingel present

9 Warden or warden’s representative
: Office of the California Attorney General, Michael Quinn present
9 Other: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

1
2

(2)

The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:

3

(3)

The outcome of the proceeding was:

4

: The case has been completely settled.

Parties will meet on December 4, 2012 at

5

1:00 pm by telephone for a status conference if an Order of dismissal has not been

6

submitted to Judge Breyer by that time. Appearance instructions, should a status

7

conference be required, are as follows: Dial 888-684-8852, enter access code 1868782 and

8

security code 7416.

9

9

The case has been partially resolved and, on or before

_______________________, counsel for defendants shall file a joint stipulation specifying

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

those claims which have been resolved and those that remain to be resolved by the Court.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

9 The parties agree to an additional follow up settlement on
______________________________________________________________________.

9

The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.

Date: October 18, 2012

_______________________________
Nandor J Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge