Woodard v. Ahern et al
Filing
74
ORDER to reschedule CMC re 73 Stipulation filed by Victor Woodard Further Case Management Conference set for 9/9/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/8/2011. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JAMES YOON, State Bar No. 177155
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VICTOR WOODARD
CLYDE A. THOMPSON, State Bar No. 72920
BENJAMIN A. THOMPSON, State Bar No. 236590
HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Tel: (510) 763-2324
Fax: (510) 273-8570
Attorneys for Defendants
DEPUTY C. CHIN and DEPUTY G. ARRIVAS
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
VICTOR WOODARD,
Plaintiff,
v.
GREGORY AHERN, et al.
19
Defendants.
CASE NO.: C09-0203 CRB
JOINT REQUEST and
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Before: Hon. Charles Breyer
20
21
The parties are currently scheduled to conduct a Further Case Management Conference
22
on June 17, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. in front of Judge Charles Breyer. This Further Case Management
23
Conference was scheduled for the parties to report the results of their settlement attempts. On
24
June 3, 2011, sua sponte, the Court ordered a new settlement conference date. Such settlement
25
conference is now scheduled for August 19, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. in front of Magistrate Judge
26
Nandor Vadas.
27
28
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-1-
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS, the parties jointly request the Court to reschedule the Case Management
Conference to a date after the date of settlement. A Case Management Conference at such later
date would be more beneficial to the parties and allow them to attempt a case resolution at the
scheduled August 19, 2011, settlement conference.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and
Defendants, acting through their respective counsel, subject to this Court’s approval, as follows:
The Further Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 17, 2011 shall
be rescheduled to September 9, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.
10
11
12
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 6, 2011
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
13
14
By: /s/ James C. Yoon
James C. Yoon
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VICTOR WOODARD
15
16
17
18
Dated: June 6, 2011
HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP
19
20
By: /s/ Benjamin A. Thompson
Benjamin A. Thompson*
Clyde Thompson
Attorneys for Defendants
DEPUTY C. CHIN and DEPUTY G. ARRIVAS
*Mr. Benjamin Thompson provided his verbal
consent that this document be electronically filed.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-2-
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Case Management Conference continued to Friday, September 9, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.
S
Dated: _ June 8, 2011
UNIT
ED
United States District Court Judge
6
I
ORD
T IS SO
7
harle
Judge C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-3-
A
H
ER
LI
RT
9
yer
s R. Bre
NO
8
ERED
R NIA
5
FO
4
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
Hon. Charles Breyer
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1
2
3
4
5
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I, James C. Yoon, attest that I obtained the concurrence of Benjamin A. Thompson in
filing this document. I declare under penalty of the laws of the United States that the foregoing
is true and correct.
Executed this 6th day of June 2011, at Palo Alto, California.
6
/s/ James C. Yoon
James C. Yoon
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?