Woodard v. Ahern et al

Filing 74

ORDER to reschedule CMC re 73 Stipulation filed by Victor Woodard Further Case Management Conference set for 9/9/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/8/2011. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 JAMES YOON, State Bar No. 177155 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 Attorneys for Plaintiff VICTOR WOODARD CLYDE A. THOMPSON, State Bar No. 72920 BENJAMIN A. THOMPSON, State Bar No. 236590 HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Tel: (510) 763-2324 Fax: (510) 273-8570 Attorneys for Defendants DEPUTY C. CHIN and DEPUTY G. ARRIVAS 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VICTOR WOODARD, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY AHERN, et al. 19 Defendants. CASE NO.: C09-0203 CRB JOINT REQUEST and [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Before: Hon. Charles Breyer 20 21 The parties are currently scheduled to conduct a Further Case Management Conference 22 on June 17, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. in front of Judge Charles Breyer. This Further Case Management 23 Conference was scheduled for the parties to report the results of their settlement attempts. On 24 June 3, 2011, sua sponte, the Court ordered a new settlement conference date. Such settlement 25 conference is now scheduled for August 19, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. in front of Magistrate Judge 26 Nandor Vadas. 27 28 JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE -1- 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS, the parties jointly request the Court to reschedule the Case Management Conference to a date after the date of settlement. A Case Management Conference at such later date would be more beneficial to the parties and allow them to attempt a case resolution at the scheduled August 19, 2011, settlement conference. 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, acting through their respective counsel, subject to this Court’s approval, as follows: The Further Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 17, 2011 shall be rescheduled to September 9, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. 10 11 12 Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 6, 2011 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 13 14 By: /s/ James C. Yoon James C. Yoon Attorneys for Plaintiff VICTOR WOODARD 15 16 17 18 Dated: June 6, 2011 HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP 19 20 By: /s/ Benjamin A. Thompson Benjamin A. Thompson* Clyde Thompson Attorneys for Defendants DEPUTY C. CHIN and DEPUTY G. ARRIVAS *Mr. Benjamin Thompson provided his verbal consent that this document be electronically filed. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE -2- 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Case Management Conference continued to Friday, September 9, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. S Dated: _ June 8, 2011 UNIT ED United States District Court Judge 6 I ORD T IS SO 7 harle Judge C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE -3- A H ER LI RT 9 yer s R. Bre NO 8 ERED R NIA 5 FO 4 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA Hon. Charles Breyer 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 1 2 3 4 5 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I, James C. Yoon, attest that I obtained the concurrence of Benjamin A. Thompson in filing this document. I declare under penalty of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 6th day of June 2011, at Palo Alto, California. 6 /s/ James C. Yoon James C. Yoon 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?