Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd v. Orellana et al

Filing 25

ORDER RE: STIPULATION REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE; EXTENDING DEADLINES TO DESIGNATE EXPERTS AND TO COMPLETE EXPERT DISCOVERY. The Court extends the deadline to designate experts from January 15, 2010 to February 22, 2010, and extends the deadline to complete expert discovery from February 19, 2010 to March 15, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 31, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Although the parties do not request an extension of the deadline to complete expert discovery, such an extension is necessary in light of the extension of the deadline to designate experts. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD., Plaintiff, v. HECTOR ANTONIO ORELLANA, et al., Defendants / No. C-09-0219 MMC ORDER RE: STIPULATION REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE; EXTENDING DEADLINES TO DESIGNATE EXPERTS AND TO COMPLETE EXPERT DISCOVERY United States District Court Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation Regarding Expert Discovery Deadline, filed December 30, 2009, by which the parties seek a two-month extension of the deadline to designate experts. Having read and considered the stipulation, the Court finds good cause exists to extend the subject deadline, although not to the extent sought by the parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby extends the deadline to designate experts from January 15, 2010 to February 22, 2010, and extends the deadline to complete expert discovery from February 19, 2010 to March 15, 2010.1 All further deadlines and dates, including the trial date, remain as scheduled. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 31, 2009 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?