Polk-Stamps v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Filing 27

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1). (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2009)

Case4:09-cv-00244-PJH Document27

Filed05/05/09 Page1 of 2

By Dana Stewart on May 05, 2009

Apr 17, 2009

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: ONLINE DVD RENTAL ANTITRUST LITIGATION (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) On April 10, 2009, the Panel transferred one civil action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See __F.Supp.2d__ (J.P.M.L. 2009). With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton. It appears that the action on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the action previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Hamilton. Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), these actions are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of April 10, 2009, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 15 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 15-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: ___________________________ Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel

MDL No. 2029

May 05, 2009

Ca e4:0 RENTAL ANTITRUST IN RE: ONLINEsDVD9-cv-00244-PJH Document27 LITIGATION

Filed05/05/09 Page2 of 2 MDL No. 2029

SCHEDULE CTO-1 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS DIST. DIV. C.A. # ALABAMA NORTHERN ALN 2 09-241 ALN 2 09-242 FLORIDA MIDDLE FLM 8 09-250 FLM 8 09-665 ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 09-744 ILN 1 09-1383 ILLINOIS SOUTHERN ILS 3 09-131 INDIANA SOUTHERN INS 1 09-136 LOUISIANA EASTERN LAE 2 09-1938 LOUISIANA MIDDLE LAM 3 09-59 MINNESOTA MN 0 09-158 NEW HAMPSHIRE NH 1 09-26 NEW YORK EASTERN NYE 1 09-617 OHIO NORTHERN OHN 3 09-360 PUERTO RICO PR 3 09-1157 VERMONT VT 1 09-28 WEST VIRGINIA SOUTHERN WVS 2 09-110 CASE CAPTION Robert Darren Touchton v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Charles Kopera v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Aimee C. Bowles v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Carla Spears v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Myles Levin v. Walmart.com USA LLC, et al. Francis Cleary v. Walmart.com USA LLC, et al. Burton S. Jones v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Martha Karatz v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Katie Hotard v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Salvadore Christina, Jr. v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Paul Michalski, et al. v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Jane L. Boynton v. Walmart.com USA LLC, et al. Stefanie Shafeek v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Robert L. Wagner v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Fernando Ortiz-Cardona v. Netflix, Inc., et al. Sascha Mayer v. Walmart.com USA LLC, et al. Brandon Walters, et al. v. Netflix, Inc., et al.