Fernandes v. Song
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/13/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2009)
THOMAS N. STEWART, III - #88128 ATTORNEY AT LAW 369 BLUE OAK LANE, 2nd FLOOR CLAYTON, CA 94517 TELEPHONE (925) 672-8452 TELEFAX (925) 673-1729 Attorneys for Michael Fernandes
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL FERNANDES, Plaintiff, v. SONG CHAE YUN, Defendants. __________________________________/ Case No. CV 09-258-CRB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER
The parties hereto stipulate as follows: The parties have reached a full and final settlement of all issues in this action. A Settlement Agreement between the parties has been fully executed. Some parts of the Settlement Agreement are to be performed in the future. The parties shall comply with their Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. The parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction for 30 months from the date hereof in order to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). Although the parties are hereby dismissing this action with prejudice, they agree that
the Court will retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties hereto in order to be able to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), and the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement for 30 months after the date hereof. Date: May 11, 2009 Date: May 12, 2009
S/Joseph G. Mason, Attorney for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED:
S/Thomas N. Stewart, III, Attorney for Plaintiff
________________________________ Judge/Magistrate RED ORDE
S DISTRICT TE C TA
RT U O
F D IS T IC T O R
arles R udge Ch
O IT IS S
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?