Villaflor v. Equifax Information Services, LLC.

Filing 117

ORDER DENYING EQUIFAX'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Defendant's motion is denied for the reason that defendant has failed to show the magistrate judge's Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 12, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is defendant Equifax Information Services LLC's ("Equifax") Motion for Relief, filed August 9, 2010, by which Equifax objects to certain portions of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte's Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order, issued July 22, 2010. Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the motion, for the reason Equifax has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (providing district court may reconsider magistrate judge's order where it has been shown to be "clearly erroneous or contrary to law"). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 12, 2010 v. United States District Court OBELIA D. VILLAFLOR, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 09-329 MMC (EDL) ORDER DENYING EQUIFAX'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, Defendant.

MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge