Villaflor v. Equifax Information Services, LLC.

Filing 124

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME. The deadline of November 12, 2010 is set for the filing of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/28/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2010)

Villaflor v. Equifax Information Services, LLC.

Doc. 124

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Seth Lehrman CSBN 178303 FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tel. [phone] [e-mail] James S. Knopf (CSBN 178934) LAW OFFICES OF JAMES S. KNOPF 1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200 San Mateo, California 94404 Tel. [phone] [e-mail] Steven F. Grover, pro hac vice STEVEN F. GROVER, P.A. 1 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tel. [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OBELIA D. VILLAFLOR and KAY B. BRICE, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, vs. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, Defendant. ) Case No: 3:09-CV-00329-MMC ) ) ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ) MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
. CASE NO.: 3:09-CV-00329-MMC 1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1

This matter is before the court on the Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Deadline. The Court has reviewed the motion and pleadings and papers filed in the instant action and finds that there is good cause to grant the motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 1. 2. 3. That the Motion to Extend Deadline is hereby GRANTED. That Scheduling Order [DE 122] is hereby vacated.
1

That a deadline of November 12, 2010 is hereby set for the filing of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 28, 2010 _____________________________ HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Th Court notes that the October 29, 2010 deadline contained in the Scheduling Order TheeCourt notes that the October 29, 2010 deadline contained in the Scheduling Order was the the provided therein by by the parties, contrary to the the implication in the was datedate provided thereinthe parties, and,and, contrary to implication in the Motion to Extend Deadline was not "conflicting" date chosen by the Court. Motion to Extend ,Deadline,awas not a "conflicting" date selected by the Court.
. CASE NO.: 3:09-CV-00329-MMC 2