Medway v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
13
NOTICE by James R. Pittman OF RELATED CASES (Fauth, Gordon) (Filed on 2/24/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gordon M. Fauth, Jr. (Cal. Bar No. 190280) gmf@classlitigation.com LITIGATION LAW GROUP 1801 Clement Avenue, Suite 101 Alameda, California 94501 Telephone (510) 238-9610 Facsimile (510) 337-1431 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiff James R. Pittman UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
JAMES R. PITTMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant
) Case No. C 08-05375 JW ) ) ) CLASS ACTION ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF RELATED CASES ) ) )
TO DEFENDANT AND ITS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, AND ALL OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiff James R. Pittman submits this Notice of Related Cases pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 3-12. The following pending actions are related to the present action within the meaning of Local Rule 3-12: (1) Tanseco v. Apple Inc., et al., Case No. C00-00275 RS, filed in the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey on August 29, 2008, and transferred to the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on January 22, 2009; and
1
NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
(2)
Medway v. Apple Inc., Case No. C09-00330 JSW, filed in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, on January 26, 2009. Respectfully submitted, LITIGATION LAW GROUP
Date: February 19, 2009
By: _____/S/ Gordon M. Fauth, Jr._____ Gordon M. Fauth, Jr. 1801 Clement Avenue, Suite 101 Alameda, California 94501 Telephone (510) 238-9610 Facsimile (510) 337-1431 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiff James R. Pittman
2
NOTICE OF RELATED CASES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?