Levine v. Citibank N.A.

Filing 120

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT. Defendant's time to answer the Third Amended Consolidated Complaint is extended through and including October 14, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 6, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2010)

In re Citibank HELOC Reduction Litigation

Doc. 120

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Lucia Nale (pro hac vice) Debra Bogo-Ernst (pro hac vice) Mayer Brown LLP 71 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 [phone] [phone] (fax) [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant, Citibank, N.A. Michael J. McMorrow (pro hac vice) Evan M. Meyers (pro hac vice) EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC 350 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 1300 Chicago, IL 60654 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Additional Counsel of Record for Both Parties Appear on Signature Page

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON; C-09-0350 MMC
28834903

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE CITIBANK HELOC REDUCTION LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C-09-0350 MMC STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON . Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties hereto, through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Consolidated Complaint in this action on

September 20, 2010. 2. Under the applicable rules, Defendant's response to the Third Amended

Consolidated Complaint is due on Thursday, October 7, 2010. 3. Defendant's counsel requires additional time in which to prepare its answer to the

Third Amended Consolidated Complaint. Plaintiffs' counsel are agreeing to grant additional time of one (1) week, through and including Thursday, October 14, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT Defendant's time to answer the Third Amended Consolidated Complaint is extended through and including October 14, 2010. SO AGREED /s/ Evan M. Meyers Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sean Reis Edelson McGuire LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 [e-mail] Jay Edelson Michael McMorrow Evan M. Meyers Edelson McGuire LLP 350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300 Chicago, IL 60654 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] James R. Patterson Alisa A. Martin Harrison Patterson & O'Connor LLP 402 West Broadway, 29th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 [e-mail] [e-mail]

1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON; C-09-0350 MMC
28834903

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Christopher Murphy, Esq. (SBN 120048) Mayer Brown LLP 350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 [phone] [phone] [e-mail] [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: __ctobe____________ O____ r 6, 2010 ________________________________ United States District Judge MAYER BROWN LLP Debra Bogo-Ernst (pro hac vice) Lucia Nale (pro hac vice) 71 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] /s/ Debra Bogo-Ernst Attorneys for Defendants Gene J. Stonebarger Stonebarger Law, APC 75 Iron Point Circle, Suite 145 Folsom, CA 95630 [e-mail] David C. Parisi Suzanne L. Havens Beckman Parisi & Havens LLP 15233 Valleyheart Drive Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 [e-mail] [e-mail]

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON; C-09-0350 MMC
28834903