Iguacu, Inc. v. Filho
Filing
352
ORDER REQUIRING CONTINUED APPEARANCE OF DEFENDANT ANTONIO CABRERA MANO FILHO AT TRIAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/30/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
EDWARD P. SANGSTER (State Bar No. 121041)
ed.sangster@klgates.com
MATTHEW G. BALL (State Bar No. 208881)
matthew.ball@klgates.com
CLAUDIA A. QUIROZ (State Bar No. 254419)
claudia.quiroz@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415.882.8200
Facsimile: 415.882.8220
Attorneys for ANTONIO CABRERA MANO FILHO
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
IGUAÇU, INC.,
Case No. C 09-0380 RS (NMC)
13
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER REQUIRING
CONTINUED APPEARANCE OF
DEFENDANT ANTONIO CABRERA
MANO FILHO AT TRIAL
14
15
v.
16 ANTONIO CABRERA MANO FILHO,
17
Defendant.
Trial Date: September 23, 2013
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 09-0380 RS (NMC)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REQUIRING CONTINUED APPEARANCE OF DEFENDANT
ANTONIO CABRERA MANO FILHO AT TRIAL
1
2
3
4
5
On January 24, 2013, this Court ordered that the trial in this matter would commence on
September 23, 2013. [Dkt. No. 256.] Trial commenced on September 23, 2013 as scheduled.
On Friday, September 27, 2013, Plaintiff Iguacu, Inc. (“Iguacu”) called Mr. Cabrera to testify
in Court. Mr. Cabrera is scheduled to resume his testimony on Monday, September 30, 2013.
It is hereby ordered that Mr. Cabrera must appear in Court on Monday, September 30, 2013
6
to continue testifying until his testimony is complete. The Court anticipates that Mr. Cabrera’s
7
appearance in Court might be required through Wednesday, October 2, 2013.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
12 Dated: September 30, 2013
13
By:
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C 09-0380 RS (NMC)
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER REQUIRING CONTINUED APPEARANCE OF DEFENDANT
ANTONIO CABRERA MANO FILHO AT TRIAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?