Iguacu, Inc. v. Filho

Filing 41

ORDER Re Supplemental Briefing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/22/2010. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. ANTONIO CABRERA MANO FILHO, Defendant. ___________________________________/ IGUACU, INC., Plaintiff, No. C-09-0380 RS (EMC) ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (Docket No. 25) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court hereby orders Plaintiff to provide supplemental briefing in support of its ex parte application for a right to attach order. More specifically, the Court is in need of additional briefing with respect to the amount of consideration that ADM allegedly paid Defendant. For the Jatai deal, Plaintiff asserts that the total consideration paid was BRL 6,483,000 because Defendant's e-mail represents that that was the "[p]urchase price to be received from ADM." Id., Ex. 5 (e-mail). Plaintiff does not count the BRL 6,000,000 listed by Defendant as "Goodwill." In contrast, for the Limeira deal, Plaintiff asserts that the total consideration paid was BRL 101,868,000 -- which consists of not only the "[p]urchase price to be received from ADM" but also the "Goodwill" (as well as another component). Plaintiff does not explain why it did not include "Goodwill" as part of the total consideration for the Jatai deal but did include "Goodwill" as part of the total consideration for the Limeira deal. Moreover, it is not clear what Plaintiff and/or Defendant mean by "Goodwill" and whether it should be included as part of the consideration paid by ADM. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to provide supplemental briefing to address these two issues -- i.e., (1) what is meant by "Goodwill" and whether it should be included as part of the consideration and (2) why "Goodwill" was included for the consideration for the Limeira deal but not for the Jatai deal. This supplemental briefing shall be filed within a week of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 22, 2010 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?