Cotton v. Cate et al

Filing 103

ORDER Vacating Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 10/14/2014. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 9 TREANDOUS COTTON, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, No. 3:09-CV-0385 WHA (NJV) ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM v. 12 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 13 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 14 15 On October 14, 2014, the court entered an order granting the parties' stipulation to vacate the 16 mandatory settlement conference set in this matter. (Doc. 102.) Accordingly, the writ of habeas corpus 17 ad testificandum issued for the appearance of Plaintiff at the settlement conference on November 6, 18 2014, at Solano State Prison is HEREBY VACATED. Plaintiff shall not be transported. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 14, 2014 ________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 EUREKA DIVISION 4 5 TREANDOUS COTTON, No. 3:09-CV-0385 WHA (NJV) 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 8 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 9 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on October 14, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy 13 of the attached and document no. 102, by placing said copies in a postage paid envelope addressed to 14 the person(s) listed below, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. 15 16 17 Litigation Coordinator Salinas Valley State Prison P.O. Box 1020 Soledad, CA 93960-1020 18 19 (by fax also) 20 21 22 ____________________________________ Linn Van Meter Administrative Law Clerk to the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?