Service Employees International Union, CTW/CLC et al v. SEIU United Healthcare Workers-West et al

Filing 491

ORDER CHANGING TIME RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 8, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document489 Filed02/08/10 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 JEFFREY B. DEMAIN (SBN 126715) JONATHAN WEISSGLASS (SBN 185008) ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 jdemain@altshulerberzon.com jweissglass@altshulerberzon.com ROBERT M. WEINBERG (admitted pro hac vice) W. GARY KOHLMAN (admitted pro hac vice) LEON DAYAN (admitted pro hac vice) RAMYA RAVINDRAN (admitted pro hac vice) BREDHOFF & KAISER, PLLC 805 Fifteenth St. N.W. Tenth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 842-2600 Facsimile: (202) 842-1888 rweinberg@bredhoff.com ldayan@bredhoff.com rravindran@bredhoff.com EDGAR N. JAMES (admitted pro hac vice) JEFF VOCKRODT (admitted pro hac vice) James & Hoffman, P.C. 1101 17th Street, NW, Suite 510 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 496-0500 Facsimile: (202) 496-0555 ejames@jamhoff.com jvockrodt@jamhoff.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT GLENN ROTHNER (SBN 67353) EMMA LEHENY (SBN 196167) ROTHNER, SEGALL, GREENSTONE & LEHENY 510 South Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 Telephone: (626) 796-7555 Facsimile: (626) 577-0124 grothner@rsgllabor.com eleheny@rsgllabor.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Hon. William H. Alsup 27 28 S T I P . FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C a s e No. 09-CV-0404 W H A (MEJ) SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) SAL ROSSELLI, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ___________________________________ ) CASE NO. 09-CV-0404 WHA (MEJ) STIPULATION FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2 Date: Time: Courtroom: N/A N/A N/A Case3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document489 Filed02/08/10 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties hereby file this stipulation for an Order extending the filing dates for Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Education Fund Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the Education Defendants' Reply thereto. No prior requests to change the briefing schedule on the Motion have been made. In Docket No. 467, the Court granted leave for the Education Fund Defendants to file their motion by January 28, 2010, and specified that their motion "shall be heard on a normal 35-day track." Docket No. 467 at 1:22. The Education Fund Defendants filed their motion on January 28. See Docket No. 471. Under the normal 35-day track, Plaintiffs' Opposition thereto is currently due this Thursday, February 11, and the Education Fund Defendants' Reply thereto is currently due next Thursday, February 18, 2010. Plaintiffs assert that they have been working diligently on their Opposition, but their best efforts to have their Opposition ready to be filed on February 11 have been impeded by the historic and unanticipated blizzard in Washington, DC area, where Plaintiffs' counsel with responsibility for drafting the Opposition reside, as set forth below in the Declaration of Jeffrey B. Demain. For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned parties stipulate to an extension, providing that the filing and service date of Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Education Fund Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment be extended from Thursday, February 11, to Monday, February 15, notwithstanding the fact that February 15 is a Court holiday, and that the filing and service date of the Education Fund Defendants' Reply thereto be extended from Thursday, February 18, to Wednesday, February 24, but that the hearing on the Motion remain scheduled for Thursday, March 4. This stipulated request will not affect any of the other dates or deadlines established by the Court in this case. The Education Fund Defendants' agreement to the foregoing extension for Plaintiffs' Opposition is expressly conditioned on the Court granting them additional time for their Reply, and on the Court retaining the March 4 hearing date. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that, if the Court is not willing to extend the due dates as requested above without extending the hearing date, the Court treat this stipulation as a S T I P . FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C a s e No. 09-CV-0404 W H A (MEJ) 1 Case3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document489 Filed02/08/10 Page3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 motion by Plaintiffs for an extension of time to file their Opposition, until Monday, February 15, 2010, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-3. In such event, the Education Fund Defendants request an equivalent amount of time to file their Reply. The undersigned parties request the Court to order the following changes to the briefing schedule on the Education Fund Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: 1. The filing and service date of Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Education Fund Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment be extended from Thursday, February 11, to Monday, February 15, 2010 (on which day the Opposition will be filed and served through the Court's ECF system, notwithstanding the Court holiday); 2. The filing and service date of the Education Fund Defendants' Reply on Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment be extended from Thursday, February 18, to Wednesday, February 24, 2010; and 3. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// S T I P . FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C a s e No. 09-CV-0404 W H A (MEJ) The hearing on the Motion shall remain scheduled for Thursday, March 4, 2010. 2 Case3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document489 Filed02/08/10 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: The foregoing is so stipulated and agreed. Dated: February 8, 2010. ALTSHULER BERZON LLP BREDHOFF & KAISER, PLLC JAMES & HOFFMAN, P.C. ROTHNER, SEGALL, GREENSTONE & LEHENY /s/ Jeffrey B. Demain By: Jeffrey B. Demain Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: February 8, 2010. McCARTHY, JOHNSON & MILLER Law Corporation DIANE SIDD-CHAMPION (SBN 78140) RAPHAEL SHANNON (SBN 83850) ANA P. PEREZ (SBN 253309) ROBERT I. LOCKWOOD (SBN 259870) 595 Market Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 882-2992 Facsimile: (415) 882-2999 E-mail: dsidd-champion@mjmlaw.us /s/ Diane Sidd-Champion By: Diane Sidd-Champion Attorneys for Defendants Sal Rosselli, John Borsos, Laura Kurre, Ralph Cornejo, Will Clayton, and John Vellardita in their capacities as Trustees or former Trustees of the SEIU UHW and Joint Employer Education Fund and Mary Ruth Gross in her capacity as Executive Director of the SEIU UHW and Joint Employer Education Fund [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. February 9, 2010. UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA S T I P . FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C a s e No. 09-CV-0404 W H A (MEJ) ER A N D IS T IC T R OF C LI 3 FO Hon. William H. Alsup United States District Court Judge lsup illiam A Judge W R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H Case3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document489 Filed02/08/10 Page5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: February 8, 2010 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ECF CERTIFICATION I, Jeffrey B. Demain, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation for Order Changing Time re Briefing Schedule for Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and [Proposed] Order Thereon. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Diane Sidd-Champion has concurred in this filing. /s/ Jeffrey B. Demain JEFFREY B. DEMAIN S T I P . FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C a s e No. 09-CV-0404 W H A (MEJ) 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?