Service Employees International Union, CTW/CLC et al v. SEIU United Healthcare Workers-West et al

Filing 666

FURTHER ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 21, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAL ROSELLI, et al., Defendants. / No. C 09-00404 WHA FURTHER ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES An order on May 20, 2010 (Dkt. No. 665), denied the parties' motion to extend the filing dates for motions for attorney's fees and costs in this matter from May 24, 2010, to June 14, 2010. That order is hereby VACATED and the briefing schedule for motions for attorney's fees modified as follows. The briefing with respect to the Section 301 injunction issue has not yet been completed. No later than SEVEN DAYS after the order deciding the Section 301 injunction issue, each side may submit a single motion for attorney's fees of no more than 25 pages. These motions should be limited to the issue of entitlement to attorney's fees, not the amount of fees sought, and should address the entire case. The motions for entitlement to attorney's fees shall be heard on a normal 35-day calendar. If it is subsequently determined that any side is entitled to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 attorney's fees, a schedule shall be set for further briefing regarding the amount of fees due. The previously existing schedule for briefing on entitlement to costs is unmodified by this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 21, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?