Trone et al v. Peanut Corporation of America

Filing 10

Trone et al v. Peanut Corporation of America

Doc. 10

1 2 3 4 RICHARD ROE, et al., 5 6 vs. Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C-09-0682 MEJ NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE /

7 JOHN DOE , et al. 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California X Defendant.

The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a United States District Judge

11 because either: 12 (1) One or more of the parties has requested reassignment to a United States District Judge, 13 or 14 (2) One or more of the parties has sought a kind of judicial action (e.g., a temporary 15 restraining order) that a Magistrate Judge may not take without the consent of all parties, the 16 necessary consents have not been secured, and time is of the essence. 17 (3) One or more of the parties is without counsel and have not made the necessary consent to 18 proceed before a Magistrate Judge within 30 days. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 All previous hearing dates are hereby VACATED. Dated: February 23, 2009

MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Dockets.Justia.com