Trone et al v. Peanut Corporation of America

Filing 24

Download PDF
Trone et al v. Peanut Corporation of America Doc. 24 Att. 17 EXHIBIT 17 TO DECLARATION OF OCONNOR Dockets.Justia.com THE RESOLUTION EXPERTS July 31 2008 Re Nelson Don vs Dallas Basketball Limited Dallas Mavericks JAMS Ref No 1310016794 Dear Counsel Enclosed please find the INTERIM any AWARD executed by Hon Glen Ashworth Please contact me if you have questions Sincerely Megan Case Moyer mmoyer Fax 2147206010 Manager End 8401 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY SUITE 610 DALLAS TX 75225 2147445267 2147206010 DON NELSON Claimant Matter in Arbitration JAMS DALLAS BASKETBALL LIMITED DALLAS MAVEIUCKS Reference No 1310016794 lb Respondent INTERIM AWARD Parties follows and Counsel The parties are identified in the caption and are represented as Mark Talbot Davenport Colleluori Donald Ryan Figari McComber Davenport LLP 3400 Bank 901 of America Plaza Street Main LB 125 Dallas TX 752023796 Ph 2149392000 and Fax 2149392090 John OConnor San Francisco Associates One Embarcadero Center Suite 1020 Ph 4156939960 CA 94111 Fax 4159810222 CounterRespondent Counsel for Claimant Geoffrey Steven Harper Stodghill Thomas Melsheimer Natalie Arbaugh Fish 1717 Richardson PC 5000 Main Street Suite 75201 Dallas TX Ph 2147475070 Fax 2147472091 CounterClaimant Counselfor Respondent Arbitrator Hon Glen JAMS The 8401 Dallas Ashworth Resolution Ret Experts Suite Central Expressway 610LB32 TX 75225 Ph 2147445267 Case Manager Fax 2147206010 Megan Moyer The Resolution Experts Suite JAMS 8401 Dallas Central Expressway 610LB32 TX75225 Ph 2148914525 Email In accordance with the parties agreement Fax 2147206010 and pursuant to Section 8b of the Fifth Amendment to the Employment Agreement all matters in controversy were submitted to binding arbitration before Hon Glen Ashworth serving as the parties sole Arbitrator The arbitration was convened in Dallas Texas over two days beginning June 23 2008 The parties proceeded to present their offers of proof including statements of counsel testimony of witnesses depositions and documentary evidence Thereafter the parties submitted postarbitration briefing for consideration By and agreement of the parties the issue of attorneys lees and costs was bifurcated deferred pending this Interim Award All issues have been determined by the evidence presented during the Arbitration The standard of proof is based on preponderance of the evidence unless otherwise stated On February 1997 Claimant Don Nelson Nelson Manager executed an Employment Agreement Agreement dina to become General of the Respondent Dallas Basketball Limited Dallas Mavericks Mavericks with Thereafter the Agreement was amended five times beginning December 1997 First Amendment to reflect Nelsons assumption of duties as Read Coach through the remainder of the 19971998 NBA as season Second Amendment became effective July 1998 to retain Nelson Read Coach through June 30 2000 as well as General Manager through Read June 30 2003 June The Third Amendment was executed to employ Nelson as Coach through 30 2003 General Manager through June 30 2006 and 2003 as Consultant from July 2006 through June 30 2011 Effective August Fourth Amendment was event of Nelsons executed to address scheduled deferred compensation payments in the death Finally the Fifth Amendment became effective July 2003 and extended Nelsons head coaching responsibilities through June 30 2006 The Fifth Amendment was While the in effect during the time period of this dispute Agreement was amended several times it was an integrated contract which remained in effect subject to control or modification by provision of more recent conflicting Amendment It is the Fifth Amendment which and essentially contains all the operative terms regarding Nelsons employment duties compensation including deferred compensation Under its terms Nelson was to receive annually 35 million for serving as Read Coach 16 million for serving as General Manager and 900000 he in deferred compensation through June 30 2006 Thereafter was to receive 200000 per year as Consultant through June 30 2011 current In January 2000 the Mavericks were purchased by its majority owner Mark Cuban Cuban and Cuban By all accounts initially good relationship existed between Nelson however by the time of the Fifth Amendment as it had deteriorated On March 19 2005 Nelson an agreement with stepped down from his Amendment duties Head Coach remained but pursuant to Cuban his Fifth to the Agreement in effect and there was no evidence it was ever terminated in accordance with Section 8A head or of the Agreement The remainder of the season was completed under new coaching regime On in July 2006 the Nelson was to begin the consulting portion of his employment accordance with terms of the Fifth Amendment The first consulting payment approximately 8000 payment was due on July 15 2006 along with the larger deferred compensation approximately 40000 was not While the deferred compensation payment was made the consulting payment The testimony reflects that Nelson and Mavericks CFO Floyd Jahner discussed the nonpayment according to as well as either lump sum payment according to Jahner or buyout Nelson Regardless no consulting payment was made nor again on July 31 2006 the Nelsons personal attorney John OConnor sent notice of breach letter to Mavericks on August 2006 and yet the third consulting payment was not made on August 15 2006 head coaching On Golden August 30 2006 Nelson accepted position with the NBA State Warriors On August 3l 2006 Nelson did not receive either his consulting salary or his scheduled payment for deferred compensation The Mavericks did however send Nelson notice of breach letter for taking the Golden State position and gave him 30 days to cure the breach The evidence supports that since that time no further consulting or deferred compensation payments have been paid by the Mavericks and Nelson continues to serve as Head Coach of the Warriors The Agreement and its five subsequent Amendments constitute one valid integrated contract and the threshold issue is to determine whether an ambiguity exists which would require the consideration of parol evidence This determination is question of law and must be decided by looking at the contract as whole in light of the circumstances surrounding its formulation The primary concern is to ascertain parties intentions from the four corners of the agreement and to give the contractual language its plain grammatical meaning Reilly Rangers Mgt Inc 727 SW2d 525 Tex 1987 From review of the entire Agreement and in concurrence with the parties acknowledgment the Agreement is found to be unambiguous Significant parol evidence was offered during the arbitration hearing and while anecdotal such extrinsic testimony was irrelevant to any interpretation of the Agreement Union Fire Ins Co CBIIndus Inc Deferred 907 SW2d 517 Tex 1995 The terms of Nelsons compensation including deferred compensation are principally found in Section and Exhibit of the Fifth Amendment The clear and plain reading of the entire Agreement including the aforementioned Section and Exhibit reflect that while the deferred compensation was to be payable his in future years it was both earned and accrued on June by Nelson during tenure as Head CoachGeneral Manager ending 30 2006 All relevant language in the Agreement supports this conclusion Section 4a provides that the deferred compensation earned in the Fifth Amendment term July 2003 June 30 2006 was in addition to the deferred compensation already earned and accrued by Employee during the period beginning July 1998 through June 30 2003 by Employee Likewise Section 4c provides that The deferred compensation earned for each 12month period as referenced in Paragraph 4a above shall be earned prorata over such 12 month period Indeed Exhibit also clearly reflects the periods in which the deferred compensation was earned no When harmonizing this language with the entire Agreement there is simply contractual support that Nelson had not fully earned his entire deferred compensation amount by June 30 2006 nor was there any clear language which tied it to any contractual performance after it had accrued Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and according to the undisputed testimony including that of Floyd Jahner Nelson had fully earned 66 million in deferred compensation that remained unpaid as of June 30 2006 Although scheduled to be payable in future years Nelson had fully performed all of his contractual obligations as Head CoachGeneral Manager and had the vested right to receive the balance of his fully earned and accrued deferred compensation following the termination of the Agreement Finally the testimony supports and the parties concur that the Agreement was not terminated pursuant to either Section cause or 8B without cause Inasmuch as the provisions of Section of the Agreement contemplate possible offset following an 8B and termination which did not occur and furthermore since there was no remaining unearned deferred compensation due at the time of the any offset from the Golden State employment is inapplicable under the Agreement The parties are in agreement and the evidence supports that Nelsons Employment Agreement did not terminate pursuant to Section but rather ceased to operate pursuant to breach Each party has correctly cited Mustang Pipeline Co Driver Pipeline Co one 134 SW3d 195 Tex 2004 material for the fundamental principle of contract law that when party commits breach of contract the other party is discharged or excused from further performance Additionally materiality is question of fact and is subject to an analysis such as found in Hernandez Gulf Group Lloyds 875 SW2d 691 Tex 1994 The evidence reveals that the Mavericks failed to pay Nelson his consulting salary beginning on July 2006 While there were discussions within the Mavericks organization as well as some negotiations between Jahner and Nelson the salary was not paid Likewise the consulting salary was again not paid on July 31 2006 Even fcllowing an August 2006 letter from Nelsons attorney John OConnor the August 2006 consulting salary was not paid Certainly the approximately 8000 Head consulting payments were small in comparison to the previously earned Gener Manager salaries in former years but at the time of nonpayment they represented Nelsons salary and benefit of the bargain going forward Additionally there is no evidence that the Mavericks ever cured this breach with payment Using Mustang PipelineHernandez analysis the non of the payment was material breach and was the operative basis for the termination Agreement While Nelsons deferred compensation was previously earned regardless the Agreement ceased to operate pursuant to the Mavericks initial breach Nelson was therefore relieved contractually from his ongoing consulting position as well as the non competition provision of Section which was only applicable during the term of the Agreement the Consequently inasmuch as he was no longer contractually committed to Mavericks pursuant to the Agreement there were no legal impediments to prevent Nelson from taking the head coaching job with the Warriors on August 30 2006 By way duty of the Mavericks aver that Nelson breached his fiduciary by taking the Warriors head coaching position and should be subjected to an equitable disgorgement of his Golden State compensation At the outset to prevail on breach of fiduciary claim the Mavericks must establish that the parties had fiduciary relationship Nelson breached fiduciary duty and Nelsons breach resulted in either injury to the Mavericks or benefit to Nelson Kelly Gaines 181 394 Tex App determination Waco of 2005 fiduciary The duty must be decided on case by case basis Johnson Brewer Pc 73 SW3d to the 193 Tex 2002 with Beginning July 2006 Nelson served only as Consultant Mavericks no specific duties or responsibilities under the Agreement and he was without any authority to bind the organization In fact the testimony reflects that his services were not utilized in this position at all Based on the evidence presented the Mavericks have failed to establish that they reposed any trust in Nelson as Consultant or that fiduciary relationship existed Certainly no fiduciary relationship existed after the Agreement terminated by the Mavericks own breach the Additionally second prong is likewise ndh factually insufficient Although Section 10 of the Agreement did contain and clause there was insufficient evidence to support that Nelson violated its terms upon leaving the Mavericks organization To the contrary the greater weight of the evidence supports that upon termination Nelson did not use or disclose any of the Mavericks proprietary or confidential information but rather left with only his over 40 years of NBA experience Finally any claim for an equitable disgorgement under the evidence is legally and factually inapplicable Therefore the Mavericks counter claims against Nelson are DENTED The Mavericks materially breached the Agreement initially by nonpayment of Nelsons consulting salary beginning July 15 2006 and on August 31 further they failed to pay Nelsons deferred compensation payment 2006 and thereafter The evidence also supports that due to the repudiation of the Agreement Nelson is entitled to recoyer immediately the total amount of deferred compensation that would otherwise have been paid to him over several years The parties have agreed and stipulated that through June 30 2008 1875000 deferred deferred compensation has not been paid Additionally future compensation that has not been paid discounted to present value as of June 30 2008 is 424257553 June The total of which is 611757553 at The interest on the past due amounts through 30 2008 is 13253425 These per annum and carries per diem of 25685 Nelsons Hearing Tr pp 584585 under the stipulated amounts were used to calculate damages Agreement as of the date of this Interim Award For the foregoing reasons it is ORDERED of contract that Nelsons breach claim against the Mavericks is GRANTED Nelson is AWARDED damages as follows 195833300 2008 in past due deferred compensation through July 31 14674084 accruing at interest on past due payments through July 31 2008 26826day as the and 417156462 compensation present day value of future deferred payments TOTAL All awarded AWARD is therefore 627663846 interest at the prevailing amounts shall bear postjudgment statutory rate Mavericks counter claims are DENIED 10 With the exception of the biftrcated issue of attorneys fees and costs all other relief not expressly granted is DENIED attorneys In the event the parties are unable to reach an agreement on the fees and costs issue within days of this Interim Award they are instructed to contact the Case Manager to set up conference with the Arbitrator to establish hearing procedure This Interim Award is interlocutory and the Arbitrator shall continue to retain jurisdiction pending entry of Final Award herein DAUD 2008 HON GLEN Arbitrator ASHWORTH Ret Re Nelson Don vs Dallas Basketball Limited Dallas Mavericks Reference No 1310016794 Cynthia Cleaveland not party to the within action hereby declare that on July 31 and 2008 served the attached Interim Award on in sealed the parties in the within action by Email by in depositing true copies thereof enclosed envelopes with postage thereon fully prepaid the United States Mail at Dallas TEXAS addressed as follows John Esq Associates Center Geoffrey Fish 1717 Suite Harper Esq OConnor Richardson PC One Embarcadero Main 5000 Street 1020 San Francisco CA 94111 USA Dallas TX 75201 Tel 4156939960 Email Tel 2142924004 Email harperfrcom Fax 2147472091 sbcglobalnet Esq Plaza Mark Figari Talbot Davenport Davenport Donald Figari Colleluori Esq LIP Davenport LLP Plaza 125 3400 901 Bank of America 3400 Main Street LB 125 1h Dallas TX inS TX Bank of America LB 752023 796 Dallas 52023796 Tel 2149392002 Email Tel 2149392007 Email figdavcom McComber Davenport donco1leluori Fax 2149392090 Ryan Figari Esq Thomas Fish 5000 1717 lsh Richardson Esq LLP Plaza 125 PC 3400 901 lreet TX 752023796 Bank of America Bank One Center Main St Dallas Dallas TX 75201 Tel 2149392014 Email rmccomberfigdavcom Tel 2142924001 Email melsheimerfrcom Fax 2147472091 Michael Fish 5000 1717 Hilgers Esq Richardson Natalie Arbaugh Esq Richardson PC Fish 5000 1717 PC Bank One Center Bank One Center Main St Main St Dallas TX 75201 Dallas TX 75201 Tel 2147606124 Email Tel 2142924076 Email arbaughfrcom Fax 2147472091 hilgers declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing to be true and correct Executed at Dallas TEXAS on July 31 2008 Cynthia Cleaveland ckcleave1and

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?