Trone et al v. Peanut Corporation of America
Filing
24
Trone et al v. Peanut Corporation of America
Doc. 24 Att. 17
EXHIBIT
17
TO DECLARATION OF OCONNOR
Dockets.Justia.com
THE
RESOLUTION
EXPERTS
July
31 2008
Re
Nelson Don vs Dallas
Basketball
Limited
Dallas
Mavericks
JAMS Ref
No
1310016794
Dear Counsel
Enclosed
please find the
INTERIM
any
AWARD
executed
by
Hon
Glen
Ashworth
Please contact
me
if you have
questions
Sincerely
Megan
Case
Moyer
mmoyer
Fax 2147206010
Manager
End
8401
CENTRAL
EXPRESSWAY
SUITE
610
DALLAS
TX 75225
2147445267
2147206010
DON NELSON
Claimant Matter
in
Arbitration
JAMS
DALLAS BASKETBALL LIMITED DALLAS MAVEIUCKS
Reference
No
1310016794
lb
Respondent
INTERIM
AWARD
Parties follows
and Counsel
The
parties
are
identified
in the
caption
and
are
represented
as
Mark
Talbot Davenport
Colleluori
Donald Ryan
Figari
McComber
Davenport
LLP
3400 Bank
901
of America Plaza Street
Main
LB
125
Dallas
TX
752023796
Ph 2149392000
and
Fax 2149392090
John
OConnor
San Francisco
Associates
One Embarcadero
Center
Suite
1020
Ph
4156939960
CA 94111 Fax 4159810222
CounterRespondent
Counsel
for Claimant
Geoffrey Steven
Harper
Stodghill
Thomas
Melsheimer
Natalie Arbaugh Fish 1717 Richardson
PC
5000
Main
Street Suite 75201
Dallas
TX
Ph
2147475070
Fax 2147472091
CounterClaimant
Counselfor
Respondent
Arbitrator
Hon Glen JAMS The
8401 Dallas
Ashworth
Resolution
Ret
Experts
Suite
Central Expressway
610LB32
TX
75225
Ph 2147445267
Case Manager
Fax 2147206010
Megan
Moyer The Resolution
Experts
Suite
JAMS
8401 Dallas
Central Expressway
610LB32
TX75225
Ph 2148914525
Email
In accordance with the parties agreement
Fax 2147206010
and pursuant
to
Section
8b
of the
Fifth
Amendment
to
the
Employment
Agreement
all
matters
in
controversy
were
submitted
to
binding
arbitration
before
Hon
Glen
Ashworth
serving
as
the
parties
sole
Arbitrator
The
arbitration
was convened
in Dallas
Texas
over two days
beginning
June
23
2008
The
parties
proceeded
to
present
their
offers
of
proof
including
statements
of counsel
testimony
of witnesses
depositions
and
documentary
evidence
Thereafter
the parties
submitted
postarbitration
briefing
for consideration
By
and
agreement
of the parties the issue
of attorneys
lees
and
costs
was
bifurcated
deferred pending
this Interim
Award
All
issues
have
been determined
by the evidence
presented during
the Arbitration
The
standard
of proof
is
based
on
preponderance
of the
evidence
unless
otherwise
stated
On
February
1997
Claimant
Don
Nelson
Nelson
Manager
executed
an
Employment
Agreement
Agreement
dina
to
become
General
of the Respondent
Dallas
Basketball
Limited
Dallas
Mavericks
Mavericks
with
Thereafter
the
Agreement
was
amended
five
times beginning
December
1997
First
Amendment
to
reflect
Nelsons
assumption
of
duties
as
Read
Coach
through
the
remainder
of the
19971998
NBA
as
season
Second Amendment became
effective
July
1998
to
retain
Nelson
Read
Coach through
June
30 2000
as
well
as
General
Manager through Read
June
30 2003
June
The Third Amendment was executed
to
employ Nelson
as
Coach through
30 2003
General Manager
through
June
30 2006 and 2003
as
Consultant
from July
2006 through
June
30 2011
Effective
August
Fourth
Amendment was
event of Nelsons
executed
to
address scheduled
deferred
compensation
payments
in the
death
Finally
the
Fifth
Amendment became
effective
July
2003
and
extended
Nelsons
head coaching
responsibilities
through
June
30 2006
The
Fifth
Amendment was
While
the
in effect
during the time period
of this dispute
Agreement
was
amended
several
times
it
was
an
integrated
contract
which remained
in
effect
subject
to
control
or
modification
by
provision
of
more
recent
conflicting
Amendment
It
is
the
Fifth
Amendment which
and
essentially
contains
all
the
operative
terms regarding
Nelsons
employment
duties
compensation including
deferred
compensation
Under
its
terms Nelson was
to
receive
annually
35
million for
serving
as
Read
Coach
16
million for serving
as
General
Manager and 900000
he
in
deferred
compensation through
June
30 2006
Thereafter
was
to
receive
200000
per year as
Consultant
through
June
30 2011
current
In
January
2000
the
Mavericks
were
purchased
by
its
majority
owner
Mark Cuban
Cuban and
Cuban
By
all
accounts
initially
good
relationship
existed
between
Nelson
however
by
the
time
of the
Fifth
Amendment
as
it
had deteriorated
On March 19 2005 Nelson
an agreement with
stepped
down from his Amendment
duties
Head
Coach
remained
but pursuant
to
Cuban
his Fifth
to
the
Agreement
in effect
and
there
was no evidence
it
was ever terminated
in accordance
with
Section
8A
head
or
of the
Agreement
The
remainder
of the
season
was
completed
under
new
coaching
regime
On
in
July
2006
the
Nelson
was
to
begin the
consulting portion of his
employment
accordance
with
terms
of the
Fifth
Amendment
The
first
consulting payment
approximately
8000
payment
was
due
on
July
15 2006
along
with
the
larger
deferred
compensation
approximately
40000
was not
While
the
deferred
compensation
payment
was made
the
consulting payment
The testimony
reflects
that
Nelson
and Mavericks
CFO
Floyd
Jahner
discussed the
nonpayment
according
to
as well
as
either
lump
sum payment
according
to
Jahner
or
buyout
Nelson
Regardless
no
consulting payment
was made
nor again on July
31 2006
the
Nelsons personal
attorney
John
OConnor
sent
notice
of breach
letter
to
Mavericks
on August
2006
and
yet the third consulting payment
was not made on August 15 2006 head coaching
On
Golden
August 30 2006
Nelson accepted
position
with
the
NBA
State
Warriors
On
August 3l 2006 Nelson did not receive
either
his consulting
salary
or
his
scheduled
payment
for
deferred
compensation
The
Mavericks
did
however
send
Nelson
notice
of breach
letter
for
taking
the
Golden
State
position
and
gave
him 30 days
to
cure the breach
The
evidence
supports
that
since
that
time
no
further
consulting
or
deferred
compensation
payments have
been
paid by the Mavericks
and
Nelson continues
to
serve
as
Head
Coach of
the
Warriors
The
Agreement
and
its
five
subsequent
Amendments
constitute
one
valid
integrated
contract
and
the
threshold issue
is
to
determine
whether
an
ambiguity
exists
which
would
require
the
consideration
of
parol
evidence
This
determination
is
question
of law and must be
decided
by looking
at the
contract
as
whole
in light
of the
circumstances
surrounding
its
formulation
The
primary
concern
is
to
ascertain
parties
intentions
from
the
four
corners of
the
agreement
and
to
give
the
contractual
language
its
plain
grammatical
meaning
Reilly
Rangers
Mgt
Inc 727
SW2d
525
Tex 1987
From
review
of the entire Agreement
and
in concurrence
with the parties
acknowledgment
the Agreement
is
found
to be
unambiguous
Significant
parol evidence
was
offered
during
the
arbitration
hearing
and while
anecdotal
such
extrinsic
testimony
was
irrelevant
to
any
interpretation
of the Agreement
Union
Fire Ins
Co
CBIIndus Inc
Deferred
907
SW2d
517
Tex 1995
The
terms
of
Nelsons
compensation
including
deferred
compensation
are
principally
found
in
Section
and
Exhibit
of the
Fifth
Amendment
The
clear
and
plain
reading
of
the
entire
Agreement
including
the
aforementioned
Section
and
Exhibit
reflect
that
while
the
deferred
compensation
was
to
be
payable
his
in
future
years
it
was
both
earned
and
accrued
on June
by
Nelson
during
tenure
as
Head
CoachGeneral
Manager
ending
30
2006
All relevant
language
in
the
Agreement
supports
this conclusion
Section
4a
provides
that
the
deferred
compensation
earned
in
the
Fifth
Amendment
term
July
2003
June
30 2006
was
in
addition
to
the
deferred
compensation
already
earned
and
accrued
by Employee
during
the
period
beginning
July
1998
through
June
30 2003
by Employee
Likewise
Section
4c
provides
that
The
deferred
compensation
earned
for
each
12month
period
as referenced
in Paragraph
4a
above
shall
be earned
prorata
over
such
12 month
period
Indeed Exhibit
also
clearly
reflects
the
periods
in
which
the
deferred
compensation
was
earned
no
When
harmonizing
this
language
with
the
entire
Agreement
there
is
simply
contractual
support
that
Nelson had not
fully
earned
his
entire
deferred
compensation
amount
by
June
30
2006
nor
was
there
any
clear
language
which
tied
it
to
any
contractual
performance
after
it
had accrued
Pursuant
to
the
terms
of the
Agreement
and
according
to
the
undisputed
testimony
including
that
of
Floyd
Jahner
Nelson had
fully
earned
66
million in
deferred
compensation
that
remained
unpaid
as of June
30 2006
Although
scheduled
to
be
payable
in
future
years
Nelson
had
fully
performed
all
of his contractual
obligations
as
Head
CoachGeneral
Manager
and
had
the
vested
right to
receive
the
balance
of his
fully
earned
and
accrued
deferred
compensation
following
the
termination
of
the
Agreement
Finally
the testimony
supports
and
the
parties
concur
that
the Agreement
was not
terminated
pursuant
to
either
Section
cause
or
8B
without
cause
Inasmuch
as
the
provisions
of Section
of the
Agreement
contemplate
possible offset
following
an
8B
and
termination
which
did not
occur
and
furthermore
since
there
was
no remaining
unearned
deferred
compensation
due
at
the
time of the
any
offset
from
the
Golden
State
employment
is
inapplicable
under
the
Agreement
The
parties
are in agreement
and
the
evidence
supports that Nelsons
Employment
Agreement
did not terminate pursuant
to
Section
but rather
ceased
to
operate pursuant
to
breach
Each
party has
correctly
cited
Mustang
Pipeline
Co
Driver
Pipeline
Co
one
134
SW3d
195
Tex 2004
material
for the
fundamental
principle
of
contract
law
that
when
party
commits
breach
of contract
the
other
party
is
discharged
or
excused
from
further
performance
Additionally
materiality
is
question
of fact
and
is
subject
to
an
analysis
such
as
found
in
Hernandez
Gulf Group
Lloyds 875
SW2d
691
Tex
1994
The evidence
reveals that the
Mavericks
failed
to
pay Nelson
his consulting salary
beginning
on July
2006
While
there
were
discussions
within
the
Mavericks
organization
as well as
some
negotiations
between
Jahner and
Nelson
the
salary
was not
paid
Likewise
the
consulting
salary
was
again
not
paid
on July 31
2006
Even
fcllowing
an
August
2006
letter
from Nelsons
attorney
John
OConnor
the
August
2006 consulting
salary
was not paid
Certainly
the
approximately
8000
Head
consulting
payments
were
small
in
comparison
to
the
previously
earned
Gener
Manager
salaries
in
former
years
but at the time of
nonpayment
they represented Nelsons
salary
and
benefit
of the
bargain
going forward
Additionally
there
is
no evidence
that
the
Mavericks
ever cured
this
breach
with
payment
Using
Mustang
PipelineHernandez
analysis
the
non
of the
payment
was
material
breach
and
was
the
operative
basis
for
the
termination
Agreement
While
Nelsons
deferred
compensation
was
previously
earned
regardless
the
Agreement
ceased
to
operate
pursuant
to
the
Mavericks
initial
breach
Nelson was
therefore
relieved
contractually
from
his ongoing
consulting position
as well
as the
non
competition
provision of Section
which was only
applicable
during
the
term
of the
Agreement
the
Consequently inasmuch
as
he
was no longer
contractually
committed
to
Mavericks
pursuant
to
the
Agreement
there
were no
legal
impediments
to
prevent
Nelson from taking the head
coaching
job with the Warriors
on August 30 2006
By way
duty
of
the
Mavericks
aver that
Nelson breached
his
fiduciary
by taking
the
Warriors
head coaching
position
and
should
be
subjected
to
an
equitable
disgorgement
of his Golden
State
compensation
At
the
outset
to
prevail
on
breach
of
fiduciary
claim
the
Mavericks
must
establish
that
the
parties
had
fiduciary
relationship
Nelson breached
fiduciary
duty
and
Nelsons
breach
resulted
in
either
injury
to
the
Mavericks
or
benefit
to
Nelson
Kelly
Gaines
181
394
Tex App
determination
Waco
of
2005
fiduciary
The
duty
must be decided
on
case
by case basis
Johnson
Brewer
Pc
73
SW3d
to the
193
Tex 2002
with
Beginning
July
2006 Nelson
served only as
Consultant
Mavericks
no
specific
duties
or
responsibilities
under
the
Agreement
and
he was
without
any
authority
to
bind
the
organization
In fact
the
testimony
reflects
that
his
services
were
not
utilized
in
this
position
at
all
Based on
the
evidence
presented
the
Mavericks
have
failed
to
establish
that
they
reposed
any
trust
in
Nelson
as
Consultant
or
that
fiduciary
relationship
existed
Certainly
no
fiduciary
relationship
existed
after the
Agreement
terminated
by
the
Mavericks
own breach
the
Additionally
second
prong
is
likewise
ndh
factually
insufficient
Although
Section
10
of
the
Agreement
did contain
and
clause
there
was
insufficient
evidence
to
support
that
Nelson
violated
its
terms
upon
leaving
the
Mavericks
organization
To
the
contrary
the
greater
weight
of the evidence
supports
that
upon termination
Nelson
did not
use
or disclose
any of the Mavericks
proprietary
or confidential
information
but
rather
left
with
only his
over
40 years of
NBA
experience
Finally
any
claim for an equitable
disgorgement
under
the
evidence
is
legally
and
factually
inapplicable
Therefore
the
Mavericks
counter
claims
against
Nelson
are
DENTED
The
Mavericks
materially
breached
the
Agreement
initially
by nonpayment
of
Nelsons
consulting
salary
beginning
July
15 2006 and
on August 31
further
they
failed
to
pay
Nelsons
deferred
compensation
payment
2006
and
thereafter
The
evidence
also
supports
that
due
to
the
repudiation of the Agreement
Nelson
is
entitled
to
recoyer
immediately
the
total
amount of deferred
compensation
that
would
otherwise
have
been
paid to him over several
years
The
parties
have
agreed
and
stipulated
that
through
June
30 2008 1875000
deferred
deferred
compensation
has
not
been
paid
Additionally
future
compensation
that
has not been
paid discounted
to present
value
as of June
30 2008
is
424257553
June
The
total
of which
is
611757553
at
The
interest
on
the
past due
amounts through
30 2008
is
13253425
These
per annum
and
carries
per diem of
25685
Nelsons
Hearing
Tr pp 584585
under
the
stipulated
amounts were used
to
calculate
damages
Agreement
as of the
date
of this Interim
Award
For the foregoing
reasons
it
is
ORDERED
of contract
that
Nelsons breach
claim against
the Mavericks
is
GRANTED
Nelson
is
AWARDED
damages
as follows
195833300
2008
in past
due
deferred
compensation
through
July
31
14674084
accruing
at
interest
on
past
due
payments
through
July
31 2008
26826day
as the
and
417156462
compensation
present
day
value
of
future
deferred
payments
TOTAL
All awarded
AWARD
is
therefore
627663846
interest at the prevailing
amounts
shall
bear postjudgment
statutory
rate
Mavericks
counter
claims are
DENIED
10
With
the
exception
of the biftrcated
issue
of attorneys
fees
and
costs
all
other
relief not
expressly granted
is
DENIED
attorneys
In
the
event
the parties
are
unable to reach
an
agreement
on
the
fees
and
costs
issue
within
days
of
this
Interim
Award
they
are
instructed
to
contact
the
Case
Manager
to
set
up
conference
with
the
Arbitrator
to
establish
hearing
procedure
This
Interim
Award
is
interlocutory
and
the
Arbitrator
shall
continue
to
retain
jurisdiction
pending
entry
of
Final
Award
herein
DAUD
2008
HON GLEN
Arbitrator
ASHWORTH Ret
Re
Nelson Don vs Dallas Basketball
Limited
Dallas Mavericks
Reference
No
1310016794
Cynthia
Cleaveland
not
party
to
the within
action
hereby declare that
on July 31
and
2008
served the
attached
Interim
Award on
in sealed
the
parties
in
the
within
action
by Email
by
in
depositing true
copies thereof enclosed
envelopes
with postage
thereon
fully prepaid
the United
States
Mail
at Dallas
TEXAS
addressed
as follows
John
Esq
Associates Center
Geoffrey Fish 1717
Suite
Harper
Esq
OConnor
Richardson
PC
One Embarcadero
Main
5000
Street
1020
San Francisco
CA
94111
USA
Dallas
TX
75201
Tel 4156939960 Email
Tel 2142924004 Email harperfrcom Fax 2147472091
sbcglobalnet
Esq
Plaza
Mark
Figari
Talbot Davenport Davenport
Donald
Figari
Colleluori
Esq
LIP
Davenport
LLP
Plaza 125
3400 901
Bank
of America
3400
Main Street LB 125
1h
Dallas
TX
inS
TX
Bank
of America
LB
752023
796
Dallas
52023796
Tel 2149392002 Email
Tel 2149392007 Email
figdavcom
McComber
Davenport
donco1leluori
Fax 2149392090
Ryan
Figari
Esq
Thomas
Fish 5000 1717
lsh
Richardson
Esq
LLP
Plaza 125
PC
3400 901
lreet
TX
752023796
Bank
of America
Bank
One Center
Main St
Dallas
Dallas
TX
75201
Tel 2149392014 Email rmccomberfigdavcom
Tel 2142924001 Email melsheimerfrcom Fax 2147472091
Michael Fish 5000 1717
Hilgers Esq Richardson
Natalie
Arbaugh Esq
Richardson
PC
Fish 5000 1717
PC
Bank
One Center
Bank
One Center
Main St
Main St
Dallas
TX
75201
Dallas
TX
75201
Tel 2147606124 Email
Tel 2142924076 Email arbaughfrcom Fax 2147472091
hilgers
declare
under
penalty
of perjury the
foregoing
to
be
true
and correct Executed
at
Dallas
TEXAS
on July 31 2008
Cynthia
Cleaveland
ckcleave1and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?