Dole Fresh Fruit Company v. O. Lippi & Co Inc et al
Filing
8
ORDER RE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITHOUT NOTICE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DOLE FRESH FRUIT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. O. LIPPI & CO., INC., et. al., Defendant. / ORDER RE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITHOUT NOTICE No. C 09-00450 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On February 2, 2009, plaintiff Dole Fresh Fruit Company filed a complaint under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. 499e, accompanied by motions for a temporary restraining order without notice and a preliminary injunction. The submissions do not establish the need for issuance of a TRO without notice. FRCP 65(b); Civ. L.R. 65-1(b). Defendant should be given notice of the motion without delay. If the complaint and motion are served on defendant today, defendant may file a RESPONSE to the motion by 5:00 on Tuesday, February 3, 2009, and a HEARING on the motion will be held Wednesday, February 4, 2009, at 2:30 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 2, 2009.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
